MIG vs QQQ
MIG vs QQQ
VanEck Moody's Analytics IG Corporate Bond ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ delivered stronger 1-year returns. MIG offers more diversification with 310 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | MIG | QQQ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.20% | 0.18% | |
| AUM | $20M | $455.8B | |
| Dividend Yield | 4.76% | 0.41% | |
| Holdings | 356 | 108 | |
| YTD Return | -2.60% | +18.34% | |
| 1Y Return | -0.86% | +28.94% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +4.52% | +25.28% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -0.28% | +15.22% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 7.2% | 30.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -21.0% | -83.0% | |
| Fund Family | VanEck | Invesco (US) | |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity | |
| Inception | Dec 1, 2020 | Mar 10, 1999 |
MIG vs QQQ Performance
VanEck Moody's Analytics IG Corporate Bond ETF (MIG) is a ETF from VanEck and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year MIG returned -0.86% while QQQ returned +28.94%. Year to date, MIG is down 2.60% versus a gain of 18.34% for QQQ.
Over three years, MIG compounded at +4.52% per year against +25.28% for QQQ; over five years the annualized figures are -0.28% and +15.22% respectively. Across the full 6-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +13.12% annualized vs +0.24%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 7.2% for MIG. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -21.0% for MIG and -83.0% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.64. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
MIG charges 0.20% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $20 vs $18 annually, a gap of $2 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, MIG currently yields 4.76% against 0.41% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
MIG and QQQ share 3 holdings out of 410 unique holdings combined, representing a 1.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, MIG or QQQ?
MIG has an expense ratio of 0.20% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $2 per year of difference.
Which performed better, MIG or QQQ?
Over the past year MIG returned -0.86% vs +28.94% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (6 years), MIG annualized +0.24% vs +13.12% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, MIG or QQQ?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 7.2% for MIG. Worst drawdown: MIG -21.0% vs QQQ -83.0%.
Should I hold both MIG and QQQ?
MIG and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.64, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between MIG and QQQ?
MIG and QQQ share 3 common holdings with a 1.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 410 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, MIG or QQQ?
MIG yields 4.76% while QQQ yields 0.41%, so MIG currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.