MDYG vs VTI

Quick Verdict

VTI has a lower expense ratio. MDYG delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 2783 holdings.

Lower Fees: VTIHigher Returns: MDYGMore Diversified: VTI

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricMDYGVTIWinner
Expense Ratio0.15%0.03%
AUM$2.9B$663.5B
Dividend Yield0.57%1.07%
Holdings2473,543
YTD Return+19.69%+14.20%
1Y Return+28.03%+24.16%
3Y Return (annualized)+16.18%+21.12%
5Y Return (annualized)+8.45%+12.37%
Volatility (annualized)18.3%15.3%
Max Drawdown-59.3%-56.6%
Fund FamilyState Street Investment ManagementVanguard (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
InceptionNov 8, 2005May 24, 2001

MDYG vs VTI Performance

State Street SPDR S&P 400 Mid Cap Growth ETF (MDYG) is a ETF from State Street Investment Management and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year MDYG returned +28.03% while VTI returned +24.16%. Year to date, MDYG is up 19.69% versus a gain of 14.20% for VTI.

Over three years, MDYG compounded at +16.18% per year against +21.12% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +8.45% and +12.37% respectively. Across the full 21-year window we track, MDYG has the edge at +9.41% annualized vs +8.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

MDYG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 18.3% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -59.3% for MDYG and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.93. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.

Fees and Cost Over Time

MDYG charges 0.15% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $15 vs $3 annually, a gap of $12 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, MDYG currently yields 0.57% against 1.07% for VTI.

Holdings Overlap

0.1%overlap

MDYG and VTI share 12 holdings out of 2786 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.1% weight overlap.

Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in MDYGWeight in VTIDifference
DT0.72%0.02%0.70%
AEIS0.63%0.02%0.61%
AAON0.40%0.01%0.39%
WMSProProPro
AVAVProProPro
AFGProProPro
AMKRProProPro
PATHProProPro
BIOProProPro
CARProProPro
See all 10 holdings MDYG shares with VTI
Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position.
Get FundXLS Pro: $29/moFirst 500 subscribers, then $49/mo. Cancel anytime.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, MDYG or VTI?

MDYG has an expense ratio of 0.15% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $12 per year of difference.

Which performed better, MDYG or VTI?

Over the past year MDYG returned +28.03% vs +24.16% for VTI, so MDYG leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (21 years), MDYG annualized +9.41% vs +8.14% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Which is riskier, MDYG or VTI?

MDYG has been the more volatile fund at 18.3% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: MDYG -59.3% vs VTI -56.6%.

Should I hold both MDYG and VTI?

MDYG and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.93, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.

What is the holdings overlap between MDYG and VTI?

MDYG and VTI share 12 common holdings with a 0.1% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2786 unique securities.

Which pays a higher dividend, MDYG or VTI?

MDYG yields 0.57% while VTI yields 1.07%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Get Full ETF Analytics

Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.

See inside every ETF you own
$29/moCancel anytime.
Try FundXLS →