LDUR vs VTI
LDUR vs VTI
PIMCO Enhanced Low Duration Active Exchange-Traded Fund vs Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 2783 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | LDUR | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.54% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $1.4B | $663.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 4.37% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 618 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +1.26% | +13.39% | |
| 1Y Return | +3.60% | +23.21% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +5.02% | +20.65% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +2.32% | +12.18% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 1.9% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -8.7% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | PIMCO (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity | |
| Inception | Jan 22, 2014 | May 24, 2001 |
LDUR vs VTI Performance
PIMCO Enhanced Low Duration Active Exchange-Traded Fund (LDUR) is a ETF from PIMCO (US) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year LDUR returned +3.60% while VTI returned +23.21%. Year to date, LDUR is up 1.26% versus a gain of 13.39% for VTI.
Over three years, LDUR compounded at +5.02% per year against +20.65% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +2.32% and +12.18% respectively. Across the full 13-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +8.11% annualized vs +1.08%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.3% compared with 1.9% for LDUR. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -8.7% for LDUR and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.38. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
LDUR charges 0.54% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $54 vs $3 annually, a gap of $51 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, LDUR currently yields 4.37% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
LDUR and VTI share 0 holdings out of 3305 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, LDUR or VTI?
LDUR has an expense ratio of 0.54% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $51 per year of difference.
Which performed better, LDUR or VTI?
Over the past year LDUR returned +3.60% vs +23.21% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (13 years), LDUR annualized +1.08% vs +8.11% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, LDUR or VTI?
VTI has been the more volatile fund at 15.3% annualized versus 1.9% for LDUR. Worst drawdown: LDUR -8.7% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both LDUR and VTI?
LDUR and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.38, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between LDUR and VTI?
LDUR and VTI share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 3305 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, LDUR or VTI?
LDUR yields 4.37% while VTI yields 1.07%, so LDUR currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.