JHS vs VOO
JHS vs VOO
John Hancock Income Securities Trust vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO delivered stronger 1-year returns. JHS offers more diversification with 518 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | JHS | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.66% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $144M | $979.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 5.09% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 881 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | -4.00% | +13.53% | |
| 1Y Return | +0.90% | +23.65% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +5.37% | +21.27% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -2.55% | +13.52% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 10.4% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -50.7% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | John Hancock Investment Management | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity | |
| Inception | Feb 14, 1973 | Sep 7, 2010 |
JHS vs VOO Performance
John Hancock Income Securities Trust (JHS) is a ETF from John Hancock Investment Management and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year JHS returned +0.90% while VOO returned +23.65%. Year to date, JHS is down 4.00% versus a gain of 13.53% for VOO.
Over three years, JHS compounded at +5.37% per year against +21.27% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are -2.55% and +13.52% respectively. Across the full 16-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.57% annualized vs -0.25%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VOO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.1% compared with 10.4% for JHS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -50.7% for JHS and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.45. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
JHS charges 1.66% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $166 vs $3 annually, a gap of $163 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, JHS currently yields 5.09% against 1.09% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
JHS and VOO share 1 holdings out of 1022 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in JHS | Weight in VOO | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| CNP | 0.10% | 0.04% | 0.06% |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, JHS or VOO?
JHS has an expense ratio of 1.66% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $163 per year of difference.
Which performed better, JHS or VOO?
Over the past year JHS returned +0.90% vs +23.65% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (16 years), JHS annualized -0.25% vs +13.57% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, JHS or VOO?
VOO has been the more volatile fund at 14.1% annualized versus 10.4% for JHS. Worst drawdown: JHS -50.7% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both JHS and VOO?
JHS and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.45, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between JHS and VOO?
JHS and VOO share 1 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 1022 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, JHS or VOO?
JHS yields 5.09% while VOO yields 1.09%, so JHS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.