IVV vs JHS
IVV vs JHS
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs John Hancock Income Securities Trust
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. JHS offers more diversification with 518 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | JHS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 1.66% | |
| AUM | $865.2B | $144M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.09% | 5.09% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 881 | |
| YTD Return | +11.54% | -4.11% | |
| 1Y Return | +21.48% | +0.79% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +20.86% | +5.39% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.02% | -2.56% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 10.4% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -50.7% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | John Hancock Investment Management | |
| Category | Equity | Fixed Income | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Feb 14, 1973 |
IVV vs JHS Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and John Hancock Income Securities Trust (JHS) is a ETF from John Hancock Investment Management. Over the past year IVV returned +21.48% while JHS returned +0.79%. Year to date, IVV is up 11.54% versus a loss of 4.11% for JHS.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +20.86% per year against +5.39% for JHS; over five years the annualized figures are +13.02% and -2.56% respectively. Across the full 26-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +6.97% annualized vs -0.26%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 10.4% for JHS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -50.7% for JHS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.32. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while JHS charges 1.66%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $166 annually, a gap of $163 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.09% against 5.09% for JHS.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and JHS share 1 holdings out of 1022 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in IVV | Weight in JHS | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| CNP | 0.04% | 0.10% | 0.06% |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or JHS?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while JHS charges 1.66%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $163 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or JHS?
Over the past year IVV returned +21.48% vs +0.79% for JHS, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (26 years), IVV annualized +6.97% vs -0.26% for JHS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or JHS?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 10.4% for JHS. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs JHS -50.7%.
Should I hold both IVV and JHS?
IVV and JHS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.32, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and JHS?
IVV and JHS share 1 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 1022 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or JHS?
IVV yields 1.09% while JHS yields 5.09%, so JHS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.