IVW vs VYM

Quick Verdict

VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM delivered stronger 1-year returns. VYM offers more diversification with 558 holdings.

Lower Fees: VYMHigher Returns: VYMMore Diversified: VYM

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricIVWVYMWinner
Expense Ratio0.18%0.04%
AUM$72.2B$79.0B
Dividend Yield0.36%2.86%
Holdings152568
YTD Return+12.28%+13.82%
1Y Return+21.86%+24.08%
3Y Return (annualized)+25.83%+17.72%
5Y Return (annualized)+13.48%+12.13%
Volatility (annualized)16.2%14.6%
Max Drawdown-72.1%-58.8%
Fund FamilyiShares by BlackRock (US)Vanguard (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
InceptionMay 22, 2000Nov 10, 2006

IVW vs VYM Performance

iShares S&P 500 Growth ETF (IVW) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year IVW returned +21.86% while VYM returned +24.08%. Year to date, IVW is up 12.28% versus a gain of 13.82% for VYM.

Over three years, IVW compounded at +25.83% per year against +17.72% for VYM; over five years the annualized figures are +13.48% and +12.13% respectively. Across the full 20-year window we track, IVW has the edge at +7.76% annualized vs +6.98%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

IVW has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.2% compared with 14.6% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -72.1% for IVW and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.81. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.

Fees and Cost Over Time

IVW charges 0.18% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $18 vs $4 annually, a gap of $14 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVW currently yields 0.36% against 2.86% for VYM.

Holdings Overlap

16.1%overlap

IVW and VYM share 35 holdings out of 672 unique holdings combined, representing a 16.1% weight overlap.

Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in IVWWeight in VYMDifference
AVGO5.01%6.47%1.46%
JPM1.74%3.36%1.62%
JNJ1.04%2.62%1.58%
CATProProPro
ABBVProProPro
CSCOProProPro
KOProProPro
PMProProPro
GSProProPro
IBMProProPro
See all 10 holdings IVW shares with VYM
Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position.
Get FundXLS Pro: $29/moFirst 500 subscribers, then $49/mo. Cancel anytime.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, IVW or VYM?

IVW has an expense ratio of 0.18% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $14 per year of difference.

Which performed better, IVW or VYM?

Over the past year IVW returned +21.86% vs +24.08% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (20 years), IVW annualized +7.76% vs +6.98% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Which is riskier, IVW or VYM?

IVW has been the more volatile fund at 16.2% annualized versus 14.6% for VYM. Worst drawdown: IVW -72.1% vs VYM -58.8%.

Should I hold both IVW and VYM?

IVW and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.81, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.

What is the holdings overlap between IVW and VYM?

IVW and VYM share 35 common holdings with a 16.1% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 672 unique securities.

Which pays a higher dividend, IVW or VYM?

IVW yields 0.36% while VYM yields 2.86%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Get Full ETF Analytics

Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.

See inside every ETF you own
$29/moCancel anytime.
Try FundXLS →