IVW vs VXUS
IVW vs VXUS
iShares S&P 500 Growth ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Quick Verdict
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. VXUS delivered stronger 1-year returns. VXUS offers more diversification with 7860 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVW | VXUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.18% | 0.05% | |
| AUM | $72.2B | $156.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.36% | 2.60% | |
| Holdings | 152 | 8,747 | |
| YTD Return | +9.85% | +11.13% | |
| 1Y Return | +19.22% | +27.13% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +23.86% | +17.24% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.17% | +8.71% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 16.2% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -72.1% | -39.9% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 22, 2000 | Jan 26, 2011 |
IVW vs VXUS Performance
iShares S&P 500 Growth ETF (IVW) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year IVW returned +19.22% while VXUS returned +27.13%. Year to date, IVW is up 9.85% versus a gain of 11.13% for VXUS.
Over three years, IVW compounded at +23.86% per year against +17.24% for VXUS; over five years the annualized figures are +13.17% and +8.71% respectively. Across the full 16-year window we track, IVW has the edge at +7.67% annualized vs +4.66%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVW has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.2% compared with 15.1% for VXUS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -72.1% for IVW and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.76. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVW charges 0.18% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $18 vs $5 annually, a gap of $13 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVW currently yields 0.36% against 2.60% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
IVW and VXUS share 1 holdings out of 8008 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in IVW | Weight in VXUS | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| ORCL | 0.36% | 0.00% | 0.36% |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVW or VXUS?
IVW has an expense ratio of 0.18% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $13 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVW or VXUS?
Over the past year IVW returned +19.22% vs +27.13% for VXUS, so VXUS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (16 years), IVW annualized +7.67% vs +4.66% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVW or VXUS?
IVW has been the more volatile fund at 16.2% annualized versus 15.1% for VXUS. Worst drawdown: IVW -72.1% vs VXUS -39.9%.
Should I hold both IVW and VXUS?
IVW and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.76, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IVW and VXUS?
IVW and VXUS share 1 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 8008 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVW or VXUS?
IVW yields 0.36% while VXUS yields 2.60%, so VXUS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.