IVV vs WTBN
IVV vs WTBN
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs WisdomTree Bianco Total Return Fund ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | WTBN | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.60% | |
| AUM | $865.2B | $102M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.09% | 4.06% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 11 | |
| YTD Return | +13.31% | -0.70% | |
| 1Y Return | +24.00% | +1.41% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.16% | - | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.34% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 4.0% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -3.4% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | WisdomTree Investments | |
| Category | Equity | Fixed Income | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Dec 20, 2023 |
IVV vs WTBN Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and WisdomTree Bianco Total Return Fund ETF (WTBN) is a ETF from WisdomTree Investments. Over the past year IVV returned +24.00% while WTBN returned +1.41%. Year to date, IVV is up 13.31% versus a loss of 0.70% for WTBN.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 4.0% for WTBN. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -3.4% for WTBN. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.32. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while WTBN charges 0.60%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $60 annually, a gap of $57 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.09% against 4.06% for WTBN.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and WTBN share 0 holdings out of 522 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or WTBN?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while WTBN charges 0.60%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $57 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or WTBN?
Over the past year IVV returned +24.00% vs +1.41% for WTBN, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), IVV annualized +7.03% vs +3.92% for WTBN. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or WTBN?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 4.0% for WTBN. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs WTBN -3.4%.
Should I hold both IVV and WTBN?
IVV and WTBN have a monthly-return correlation of 0.32, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and WTBN?
IVV and WTBN share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 522 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or WTBN?
IVV yields 1.09% while WTBN yields 4.06%, so WTBN currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.