IVV vs STXF

Quick Verdict

IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.

Lower Fees: IVVHigher Returns: IVVMore Diversified: IVV

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricIVVSTXFWinner
Expense Ratio0.03%0.05%
AUM$865.2B$1.1B
Dividend Yield1.09%1.02%
Holdings508506
YTD Return+11.54%+11.55%
1Y Return+21.48%+21.16%
3Y Return (annualized)+20.86%+21.01%
5Y Return (annualized)+13.02%-
Volatility (annualized)15.1%13.4%
Max Drawdown-56.5%-19.0%
Fund FamilyiShares by BlackRock (US)Strive Asset Management
CategoryEquityEquity
InceptionMay 15, 2000Sep 15, 2022

IVV vs STXF Performance

iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Strive 500 ETF (STXF) is a ETF from Strive Asset Management. Over the past year IVV returned +21.48% while STXF returned +21.16%. Year to date, IVV is up 11.54% versus a gain of 11.55% for STXF.

Over three years, IVV compounded at +20.86% per year against +21.01% for STXF. Across the full 4-year window we track, STXF has the edge at +20.73% annualized vs +6.97%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 13.4% for STXF. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -19.0% for STXF. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 1.00. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.

Fees and Cost Over Time

IVV charges 0.03% per year while STXF charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $5 annually, a gap of $2 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.09% against 1.02% for STXF.

Holdings Overlap

87.7%overlap

IVV and STXF share 422 holdings out of 579 unique holdings combined, representing a 87.7% weight overlap.

High overlap means holding both may not provide much additional diversification.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in IVVWeight in STXFDifference
NVDA7.76%7.89%0.13%
AAPL7.44%6.62%0.82%
MSFT4.57%4.98%0.41%
AMZNProProPro
GOOGProProPro
AVGOProProPro
METAProProPro
TSLAProProPro
MUProProPro
LLYProProPro
See all 10 holdings IVV shares with STXF
Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position.
Get FundXLS Pro: $29/moFirst 500 subscribers, then $49/mo. Cancel anytime.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, IVV or STXF?

IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while STXF charges 0.05%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $2 per year of difference.

Which performed better, IVV or STXF?

Over the past year IVV returned +21.48% vs +21.16% for STXF, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), IVV annualized +6.97% vs +20.73% for STXF. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Which is riskier, IVV or STXF?

IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 13.4% for STXF. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs STXF -19.0%.

Should I hold both IVV and STXF?

IVV and STXF have a monthly-return correlation of 1.00, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.

What is the holdings overlap between IVV and STXF?

IVV and STXF share 422 common holdings with a 87.7% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 579 unique securities.

Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or STXF?

IVV yields 1.09% while STXF yields 1.02%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Get Full ETF Analytics

Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.

See inside every ETF you own
$29/moCancel anytime.
Try FundXLS →