IVV vs SFTY
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Horizon Managed Risk ETF
Which is better, IVV or SFTY?
Nearly the same fund. IVV costs less.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over the full window, SFTY over 1Y. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.99. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 41.3%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | SFTY |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 0.77% |
| AUM | $879.1B | $810M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.09% | 0.17% |
| Holdings | 509 | 339 |
| YTD Return | +11.33% | +11.37%Best |
| 1Y Return | +13.50% | +13.79%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +20.45% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +11.61% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 11.4% | 10.4%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -8.9% | -8.6%Best |
| $10,000 over 1.4 years | $12,543Best | $12,491 |
| Top 10 Weight | 37.3%Best | 41.3% |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Horizon Funds |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Jun 25, 2025 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.4 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jun 26, 2025 to Nov 13, 2026 (1.4 years).
IVV vs SFTY growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.4 years both funds cover.
IVV vs SFTY Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Horizon Managed Risk ETF (SFTY) is an ETF from Horizon Funds. Over the past year IVV returned +13.50% while SFTY returned +13.79%. Year to date, IVV is up 11.33% versus a gain of 11.37% for SFTY.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 11.4% compared with 10.4% for SFTY. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -8.9% for IVV and -8.6% for SFTY. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.99. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while SFTY charges 0.77%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $77 annually, a gap of $74 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.09% against 0.17% for SFTY.
Holdings Overlap
78.4% of IVV's money is in holdings SFTY also owns. 91.8% of SFTY's money is in holdings IVV also owns.
Most of SFTY is already inside IVV. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
158 positions in common, counted across the 490 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 168 in SFTY, against full books of 509 and 339.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 10 positions for SFTY that do not appear in our book for IVV (8.2% of the fund), and 327 for IVV that do not appear in SFTY (20.3%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in IVV | Weight in SFTY | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| AAPLApple, Inc | 7.70% | 6.76% | 0.94% |
| NVDANvidia Corp. | 7.58% | 6.34% | 1.24% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp 4.100 Feb 06 37 | 5.93% | 5.52% | 0.41% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc | 2.51% | 4.39% | 1.88% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 3.61% | 1.86% | 1.75% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 2.37% | 2.53% | 0.16% |
| BRK.ABerkshire Hathaway Inc | 1.55% | 2.84% | 1.29% |
| LLYEli Lilly & Co. | 1.74% | 2.44% | 0.70% |
| METAMeta Platform Inc | 2.08% | 1.77% | 0.31% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 1.53% | 2.13% | 0.60% |
91.8% of SFTY is already inside IVV.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or SFTY?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while SFTY charges 0.77%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $74 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, IVV or SFTY?
Over the past year IVV returned +13.50% vs +13.79% for SFTY, so SFTY leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), IVV annualized +17.57% vs +17.22% for SFTY. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, IVV or SFTY?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 11.4% annualized versus 10.4% for SFTY. Worst drawdown: IVV -8.9% vs SFTY -8.6%.
Should I hold both IVV and SFTY?
IVV and SFTY have a monthly-return correlation of 0.99, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and SFTY?
91.8% of SFTY's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 91.8% of SFTY's is in holdings IVV also owns. They hold 158 positions in common, counted across the 490 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 168 in SFTY.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or SFTY?
IVV yields 1.09% while SFTY yields 0.17%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is SFTY better than IVV?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over the full window, SFTY over 1Y. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.99. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 41.3%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.