IVV vs QVML

Quick Verdict

IVV has a lower expense ratio. QVML delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.

Lower Fees: IVVHigher Returns: QVMLMore Diversified: IVV

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricIVVQVMLWinner
Expense Ratio0.03%0.11%
AUM$865.2B$1.5B
Dividend Yield1.09%1.01%
Holdings508451
YTD Return+11.54%+12.72%
1Y Return+21.48%+22.61%
3Y Return (annualized)+20.86%+21.29%
5Y Return (annualized)+13.02%+13.25%
Volatility (annualized)15.1%15.3%
Max Drawdown-56.5%-23.5%
Fund FamilyiShares by BlackRock (US)Invesco (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
InceptionMay 15, 2000Jun 28, 2021

IVV vs QVML Performance

iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Invesco S&P 500 QVM Multi-factor ETF (QVML) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year IVV returned +21.48% while QVML returned +22.61%. Year to date, IVV is up 11.54% versus a gain of 12.72% for QVML.

Over three years, IVV compounded at +20.86% per year against +21.29% for QVML; over five years the annualized figures are +13.02% and +13.25% respectively. Across the full 5-year window we track, QVML has the edge at +13.63% annualized vs +6.97%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

QVML has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.3% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -23.5% for QVML. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.99. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.

Fees and Cost Over Time

IVV charges 0.03% per year while QVML charges 0.11%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $11 annually, a gap of $8 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.09% against 1.01% for QVML.

Holdings Overlap

82.8%overlap

IVV and QVML share 436 holdings out of 516 unique holdings combined, representing a 82.8% weight overlap.

High overlap means holding both may not provide much additional diversification.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in IVVWeight in QVMLDifference
NVDA7.76%8.14%0.38%
AAPL7.44%7.23%0.21%
MSFT4.57%4.59%0.02%
GOOGProProPro
AMZNProProPro
AVGOProProPro
METAProProPro
MUProProPro
LLYProProPro
JPMProProPro
See all 10 holdings IVV shares with QVML
Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position.
Get FundXLS Pro: $29/moFirst 500 subscribers, then $49/mo. Cancel anytime.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, IVV or QVML?

IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while QVML charges 0.11%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $8 per year of difference.

Which performed better, IVV or QVML?

Over the past year IVV returned +21.48% vs +22.61% for QVML, so QVML leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (5 years), IVV annualized +6.97% vs +13.63% for QVML. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Which is riskier, IVV or QVML?

QVML has been the more volatile fund at 15.3% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs QVML -23.5%.

Should I hold both IVV and QVML?

IVV and QVML have a monthly-return correlation of 0.99, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.

What is the holdings overlap between IVV and QVML?

IVV and QVML share 436 common holdings with a 82.8% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 516 unique securities.

Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or QVML?

IVV yields 1.09% while QVML yields 1.01%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Get Full ETF Analytics

Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.

See inside every ETF you own
$29/moCancel anytime.
Try FundXLS →