IVV vs PTLC

Quick Verdict

IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.

Lower Fees: IVVHigher Returns: IVVMore Diversified: IVV

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricIVVPTLCWinner
Expense Ratio0.03%0.60%
AUM$865.2B$3.2B
Dividend Yield1.09%1.01%
Holdings508506
YTD Return+13.13%+7.54%
1Y Return+22.90%+15.41%
3Y Return (annualized)+21.08%+13.26%
5Y Return (annualized)+13.27%+9.90%
Volatility (annualized)15.1%65348.8%
Max Drawdown-56.5%-100.0%
Fund FamilyiShares by BlackRock (US)Pacer ETFs
CategoryEquityEquity
InceptionMay 15, 2000Jun 11, 2015

IVV vs PTLC Performance

iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Pacer Trendpilot US Large Cap ETF (PTLC) is a ETF from Pacer ETFs. Over the past year IVV returned +22.90% while PTLC returned +15.41%. Year to date, IVV is up 13.13% versus a gain of 7.54% for PTLC.

Over three years, IVV compounded at +21.08% per year against +13.26% for PTLC; over five years the annualized figures are +13.27% and +9.90% respectively. Across the full 21-year window we track, PTLC has the edge at +36.99% annualized vs +7.02%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

PTLC has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 65348.8% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -100.0% for PTLC. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.06. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.

Fees and Cost Over Time

IVV charges 0.03% per year while PTLC charges 0.60%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $60 annually, a gap of $57 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.09% against 1.01% for PTLC.

Holdings Overlap

95.7%overlap

IVV and PTLC share 483 holdings out of 515 unique holdings combined, representing a 95.7% weight overlap.

High overlap means holding both may not provide much additional diversification.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in IVVWeight in PTLCDifference
NVDA7.76%7.33%0.43%
AAPL7.44%7.04%0.40%
MSFT4.57%4.50%0.07%
AMZNProProPro
GOOGLProProPro
AVGOProProPro
GOOGProProPro
METAProProPro
MUProProPro
TSLAProProPro
See all 10 holdings IVV shares with PTLC
Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position.
Get FundXLS Pro: $29/moFirst 500 subscribers, then $49/mo. Cancel anytime.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, IVV or PTLC?

IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while PTLC charges 0.60%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $57 per year of difference.

Which performed better, IVV or PTLC?

Over the past year IVV returned +22.90% vs +15.41% for PTLC, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (21 years), IVV annualized +7.02% vs +36.99% for PTLC. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Which is riskier, IVV or PTLC?

PTLC has been the more volatile fund at 65348.8% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs PTLC -100.0%.

Should I hold both IVV and PTLC?

IVV and PTLC have a monthly-return correlation of -0.06, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.

What is the holdings overlap between IVV and PTLC?

IVV and PTLC share 483 common holdings with a 95.7% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 515 unique securities.

Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or PTLC?

IVV yields 1.09% while PTLC yields 1.01%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Get Full ETF Analytics

Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.

See inside every ETF you own
$29/moCancel anytime.
Try FundXLS →