IVV vs NTSX

Quick Verdict

IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.

Lower Fees: IVVHigher Returns: IVVMore Diversified: IVV

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricIVVNTSXWinner
Expense Ratio0.03%0.20%
AUM$865.2B$1.3B
Dividend Yield1.09%1.09%
Holdings508503
YTD Return+13.80%+11.13%
1Y Return+23.70%+19.82%
3Y Return (annualized)+21.49%+18.88%
5Y Return (annualized)+13.43%+8.75%
Volatility (annualized)15.1%16.3%
Max Drawdown-56.5%-31.3%
Fund FamilyiShares by BlackRock (US)WisdomTree Investments
CategoryEquityEquity
InceptionMay 15, 2000Aug 2, 2018

IVV vs NTSX Performance

iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and WisdomTree US Efficient Core Fund (NTSX) is a ETF from WisdomTree Investments. Over the past year IVV returned +23.70% while NTSX returned +19.82%. Year to date, IVV is up 13.80% versus a gain of 11.13% for NTSX.

Over three years, IVV compounded at +21.49% per year against +18.88% for NTSX; over five years the annualized figures are +13.43% and +8.75% respectively. Across the full 8-year window we track, NTSX has the edge at +12.48% annualized vs +7.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

NTSX has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.3% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -31.3% for NTSX. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.98. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.

Fees and Cost Over Time

IVV charges 0.03% per year while NTSX charges 0.20%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $20 annually, a gap of $17 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.09% against 1.09% for NTSX.

Holdings Overlap

77.6%overlap

IVV and NTSX share 402 holdings out of 596 unique holdings combined, representing a 77.6% weight overlap.

High overlap means holding both may not provide much additional diversification.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in IVVWeight in NTSXDifference
NVDA7.76%6.81%0.95%
AAPL7.44%6.00%1.44%
MSFT4.57%4.26%0.31%
GOOGLProProPro
AMZNProProPro
AVGOProProPro
METAProProPro
TSLAProProPro
LLYProProPro
JPM:USProProPro
See all 10 holdings IVV shares with NTSX
Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position.
Get FundXLS Pro: $29/moFirst 500 subscribers, then $49/mo. Cancel anytime.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, IVV or NTSX?

IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while NTSX charges 0.20%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $17 per year of difference.

Which performed better, IVV or NTSX?

Over the past year IVV returned +23.70% vs +19.82% for NTSX, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (8 years), IVV annualized +7.05% vs +12.48% for NTSX. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Which is riskier, IVV or NTSX?

NTSX has been the more volatile fund at 16.3% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs NTSX -31.3%.

Should I hold both IVV and NTSX?

IVV and NTSX have a monthly-return correlation of 0.98, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.

What is the holdings overlap between IVV and NTSX?

IVV and NTSX share 402 common holdings with a 77.6% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 596 unique securities.

Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or NTSX?

IVV yields 1.09% while NTSX yields 1.09%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Get Full ETF Analytics

Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.

See inside every ETF you own
$29/moCancel anytime.
Try FundXLS →