IVV vs NBSD
IVV vs NBSD
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Neuberger Berman Short Duration Income ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | NBSD | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.35% | |
| AUM | $865.2B | $1.2B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.09% | 4.79% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 880 | |
| YTD Return | +13.80% | +1.56% | |
| 1Y Return | +23.70% | +3.90% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.49% | - | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.43% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 2.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -2.6% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Neuberger Berman | |
| Category | Equity | Fixed Income | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Jun 24, 2024 |
IVV vs NBSD Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Neuberger Berman Short Duration Income ETF (NBSD) is a ETF from Neuberger Berman. Over the past year IVV returned +23.70% while NBSD returned +3.90%. Year to date, IVV is up 13.80% versus a gain of 1.56% for NBSD.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 2.1% for NBSD. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -2.6% for NBSD. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.25. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while NBSD charges 0.35%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $35 annually, a gap of $32 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.09% against 4.79% for NBSD.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and NBSD share 1 holdings out of 914 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.2% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in IVV | Weight in NBSD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| GS | 0.50% | 0.20% | 0.30% |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or NBSD?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while NBSD charges 0.35%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $32 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or NBSD?
Over the past year IVV returned +23.70% vs +3.90% for NBSD, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), IVV annualized +7.05% vs +5.54% for NBSD. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or NBSD?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 2.1% for NBSD. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs NBSD -2.6%.
Should I hold both IVV and NBSD?
IVV and NBSD have a monthly-return correlation of 0.25, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and NBSD?
IVV and NBSD share 1 common holdings with a 0.2% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 914 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or NBSD?
IVV yields 1.09% while NBSD yields 4.79%, so NBSD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.