IVV vs MODL

Quick Verdict

IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.

Lower Fees: IVVHigher Returns: IVVMore Diversified: IVV

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricIVVMODLWinner
Expense Ratio0.03%0.46%
AUM$865.2B$1.0B
Dividend Yield1.09%0.71%
Holdings508371
YTD Return+13.80%+11.63%
1Y Return+23.70%+21.53%
3Y Return (annualized)+21.49%+20.25%
5Y Return (annualized)+13.43%-
Volatility (annualized)15.1%12.4%
Max Drawdown-56.5%-17.6%
Fund FamilyiShares by BlackRock (US)Victory Capital Management Inc.
CategoryEquityEquity
InceptionMay 15, 2000Oct 11, 2022

IVV vs MODL Performance

iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and VictoryShares WestEnd US Sector ETF (MODL) is a ETF from Victory Capital Management Inc.. Over the past year IVV returned +23.70% while MODL returned +21.53%. Year to date, IVV is up 13.80% versus a gain of 11.63% for MODL.

Over three years, IVV compounded at +21.49% per year against +20.25% for MODL. Across the full 4-year window we track, MODL has the edge at +22.88% annualized vs +7.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 12.4% for MODL. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -17.6% for MODL. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.98. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.

Fees and Cost Over Time

IVV charges 0.03% per year while MODL charges 0.46%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $46 annually, a gap of $43 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.09% against 0.71% for MODL.

Holdings Overlap

72.8%overlap

IVV and MODL share 315 holdings out of 558 unique holdings combined, representing a 72.8% weight overlap.

High overlap means holding both may not provide much additional diversification.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in IVVWeight in MODLDifference
NVDA7.76%6.66%1.10%
AAPL7.44%5.57%1.87%
MSFT4.57%3.92%0.65%
GOOGLProProPro
GOOGProProPro
AMZNProProPro
AVGOProProPro
METAProProPro
JPM:USProProPro
LLYProProPro
See all 10 holdings IVV shares with MODL
Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position.
Get FundXLS Pro: $29/moFirst 500 subscribers, then $49/mo. Cancel anytime.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, IVV or MODL?

IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while MODL charges 0.46%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $43 per year of difference.

Which performed better, IVV or MODL?

Over the past year IVV returned +23.70% vs +21.53% for MODL, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), IVV annualized +7.05% vs +22.88% for MODL. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Which is riskier, IVV or MODL?

IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 12.4% for MODL. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs MODL -17.6%.

Should I hold both IVV and MODL?

IVV and MODL have a monthly-return correlation of 0.98, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.

What is the holdings overlap between IVV and MODL?

IVV and MODL share 315 common holdings with a 72.8% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 558 unique securities.

Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or MODL?

IVV yields 1.09% while MODL yields 0.71%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Get Full ETF Analytics

Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.

See inside every ETF you own
$29/moCancel anytime.
Try FundXLS →