IVV vs MAMB
IVV vs MAMB
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Monarch Ambassador Income Index ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | MAMB | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 1.26% | |
| AUM | $865.2B | $192M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.09% | 2.66% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 10 | |
| YTD Return | +13.80% | +0.13% | |
| 1Y Return | +23.70% | +4.54% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.49% | +5.27% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.43% | +0.42% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 7.0% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -19.3% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Monarch Funds | |
| Category | Equity | Fixed Income | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Mar 23, 2021 |
IVV vs MAMB Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Monarch Ambassador Income Index ETF (MAMB) is a ETF from Monarch Funds. Over the past year IVV returned +23.70% while MAMB returned +4.54%. Year to date, IVV is up 13.80% versus a gain of 0.13% for MAMB.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +21.49% per year against +5.27% for MAMB; over five years the annualized figures are +13.43% and +0.42% respectively. Across the full 5-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +7.05% annualized vs +0.71%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 7.0% for MAMB. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -19.3% for MAMB. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.63. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while MAMB charges 1.26%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $126 annually, a gap of $123 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.09% against 2.66% for MAMB.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and MAMB share 0 holdings out of 512 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or MAMB?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while MAMB charges 1.26%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $123 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or MAMB?
Over the past year IVV returned +23.70% vs +4.54% for MAMB, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (5 years), IVV annualized +7.05% vs +0.71% for MAMB. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or MAMB?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 7.0% for MAMB. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs MAMB -19.3%.
Should I hold both IVV and MAMB?
IVV and MAMB have a monthly-return correlation of 0.63, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and MAMB?
IVV and MAMB share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 512 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or MAMB?
IVV yields 1.09% while MAMB yields 2.66%, so MAMB currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.