IVV vs LGI
IVV vs LGI
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Lazard Global Total Return and Income Fund
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | LGI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 1.72% | |
| AUM | $865.2B | - | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.09% | 9.83% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 108 | |
| YTD Return | +13.80% | +12.22% | |
| 1Y Return | +23.70% | +19.99% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.49% | +17.31% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.43% | +7.11% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 19.5% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -67.2% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Lazard Asset Management | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Apr 28, 2004 |
IVV vs LGI Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Lazard Global Total Return and Income Fund (LGI) is a ETF from Lazard Asset Management. Over the past year IVV returned +23.70% while LGI returned +19.99%. Year to date, IVV is up 13.80% versus a gain of 12.22% for LGI.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +21.49% per year against +17.31% for LGI; over five years the annualized figures are +13.43% and +7.11% respectively. Across the full 22-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +7.05% annualized vs +1.95%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
LGI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 19.5% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -67.2% for LGI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.85. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while LGI charges 1.72%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $172 annually, a gap of $169 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.09% against 9.83% for LGI.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and LGI share 28 holdings out of 545 unique holdings combined, representing a 18.9% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in IVV | Weight in LGI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| AAPL | 7.44% | 4.69% | 2.75% |
| MSFT | 4.57% | 3.10% | 1.47% |
| AMZN | 3.75% | 3.00% | 0.75% |
| GOOGL | Pro | Pro | Pro |
| V | Pro | Pro | Pro |
| KLAC | Pro | Pro | Pro |
| META | Pro | Pro | Pro |
| SCHW | Pro | Pro | Pro |
| APH | Pro | Pro | Pro |
| KO | Pro | Pro | Pro |
See all 10 holdings IVV shares with LGI Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position. Get FundXLS Pro: $29/moFirst 500 subscribers, then $49/mo. Cancel anytime. | |||
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or LGI?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while LGI charges 1.72%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $169 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or LGI?
Over the past year IVV returned +23.70% vs +19.99% for LGI, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (22 years), IVV annualized +7.05% vs +1.95% for LGI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or LGI?
LGI has been the more volatile fund at 19.5% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs LGI -67.2%.
Should I hold both IVV and LGI?
IVV and LGI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.85, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and LGI?
IVV and LGI share 28 common holdings with a 18.9% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 545 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or LGI?
IVV yields 1.09% while LGI yields 9.83%, so LGI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.