IVV vs JHMM

Quick Verdict

IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. JHMM offers more diversification with 642 holdings.

Lower Fees: IVVHigher Returns: IVVMore Diversified: JHMM

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricIVVJHMMWinner
Expense Ratio0.03%0.41%
AUM$865.2B$5.9B
Dividend Yield1.09%0.88%
Holdings508668
YTD Return+11.54%+13.36%
1Y Return+21.48%+21.44%
3Y Return (annualized)+20.86%+15.38%
5Y Return (annualized)+13.02%+8.42%
Volatility (annualized)15.1%17.3%
Max Drawdown-56.5%-40.7%
Fund FamilyiShares by BlackRock (US)John Hancock Investment Management
CategoryEquityEquity
InceptionMay 15, 2000Sep 28, 2015

IVV vs JHMM Performance

iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and John Hancock Multifactor Mid Cap ETF (JHMM) is a ETF from John Hancock Investment Management. Over the past year IVV returned +21.48% while JHMM returned +21.44%. Year to date, IVV is up 11.54% versus a gain of 13.36% for JHMM.

Over three years, IVV compounded at +20.86% per year against +15.38% for JHMM; over five years the annualized figures are +13.02% and +8.42% respectively. Across the full 11-year window we track, JHMM has the edge at +11.55% annualized vs +6.97%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

JHMM has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.3% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -40.7% for JHMM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.92. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.

Fees and Cost Over Time

IVV charges 0.03% per year while JHMM charges 0.41%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $41 annually, a gap of $38 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.09% against 0.88% for JHMM.

Holdings Overlap

8.9%overlap

IVV and JHMM share 240 holdings out of 907 unique holdings combined, representing a 8.9% weight overlap.

Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in IVVWeight in JHMMDifference
FIX0.10%0.68%0.58%
MPWR0.11%0.65%0.54%
COHR0.10%0.65%0.55%
PRProProPro
CIENProProPro
KEYSProProPro
LITEProProPro
TRGPProProPro
TERProProPro
DVNProProPro
See all 10 holdings IVV shares with JHMM
Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position.
Get FundXLS Pro: $29/moFirst 500 subscribers, then $49/mo. Cancel anytime.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, IVV or JHMM?

IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while JHMM charges 0.41%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $38 per year of difference.

Which performed better, IVV or JHMM?

Over the past year IVV returned +21.48% vs +21.44% for JHMM, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (11 years), IVV annualized +6.97% vs +11.55% for JHMM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Which is riskier, IVV or JHMM?

JHMM has been the more volatile fund at 17.3% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs JHMM -40.7%.

Should I hold both IVV and JHMM?

IVV and JHMM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.92, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.

What is the holdings overlap between IVV and JHMM?

IVV and JHMM share 240 common holdings with a 8.9% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 907 unique securities.

Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or JHMM?

IVV yields 1.09% while JHMM yields 0.88%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Get Full ETF Analytics

Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.

See inside every ETF you own
$29/moCancel anytime.
Try FundXLS →