IVV vs JHMD
IVV vs JHMD
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs John Hancock MultiFactor Developed International ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. JHMD delivered stronger 1-year returns. JHMD offers more diversification with 575 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | JHMD | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.39% | |
| AUM | $865.2B | $943M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.09% | 3.07% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 590 | |
| YTD Return | +11.54% | +10.90% | |
| 1Y Return | +21.48% | +23.91% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +20.86% | +17.30% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.02% | +9.24% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 14.9% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -38.9% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | John Hancock Investment Management | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Dec 15, 2016 |
IVV vs JHMD Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and John Hancock MultiFactor Developed International ETF (JHMD) is a ETF from John Hancock Investment Management. Over the past year IVV returned +21.48% while JHMD returned +23.91%. Year to date, IVV is up 11.54% versus a gain of 10.90% for JHMD.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +20.86% per year against +17.30% for JHMD; over five years the annualized figures are +13.02% and +9.24% respectively. Across the full 10-year window we track, JHMD has the edge at +8.53% annualized vs +6.97%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 14.9% for JHMD. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -38.9% for JHMD. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.82. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while JHMD charges 0.39%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $39 annually, a gap of $36 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.09% against 3.07% for JHMD.
Holdings Overlap
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or JHMD?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while JHMD charges 0.39%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $36 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or JHMD?
Over the past year IVV returned +21.48% vs +23.91% for JHMD, so JHMD leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (10 years), IVV annualized +6.97% vs +8.53% for JHMD. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or JHMD?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 14.9% for JHMD. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs JHMD -38.9%.
Should I hold both IVV and JHMD?
IVV and JHMD have a monthly-return correlation of 0.82, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and JHMD?
IVV and JHMD share 2 common holdings with a 0.1% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 1078 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or JHMD?
IVV yields 1.09% while JHMD yields 3.07%, so JHMD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.