IUSB vs VTI

Quick Verdict

VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. IUSB offers more diversification with 9319 holdings.

Lower Fees: VTIHigher Returns: VTIMore Diversified: IUSB

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricIUSBVTIWinner
Expense Ratio0.06%0.03%
AUM$43.1B$663.5B
Dividend Yield4.20%1.07%
Holdings17,5783,543
YTD Return-0.45%+11.83%
1Y Return+1.98%+21.79%
3Y Return (annualized)+4.40%+20.40%
5Y Return (annualized)-0.09%+11.96%
Volatility (annualized)4.8%15.3%
Max Drawdown-50.2%-56.6%
Fund FamilyiShares by BlackRock (US)Vanguard (US)
CategoryFixed IncomeEquity
InceptionJun 10, 2014May 24, 2001

IUSB vs VTI Performance

iShares Core Universal USD Bond ETF (IUSB) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year IUSB returned +1.98% while VTI returned +21.79%. Year to date, IUSB is down 0.45% versus a gain of 11.83% for VTI.

Over three years, IUSB compounded at +4.40% per year against +20.40% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are -0.09% and +11.96% respectively. Across the full 12-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +8.06% annualized vs +0.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.3% compared with 4.8% for IUSB. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -50.2% for IUSB and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.45. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.

Fees and Cost Over Time

IUSB charges 0.06% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $6 vs $3 annually, a gap of $3 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IUSB currently yields 4.20% against 1.07% for VTI.

Holdings Overlap

0.0%overlap

IUSB and VTI share 5 holdings out of 12097 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.

Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in IUSBWeight in VTIDifference
LRCX0.00%0.74%0.74%
GE0.00%0.54%0.54%
AON0.00%0.09%0.09%
CNPProProPro
THCProProPro
See all 5 holdings IUSB shares with VTI
Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position.
Get FundXLS Pro: $29/moFirst 500 subscribers, then $49/mo. Cancel anytime.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, IUSB or VTI?

IUSB has an expense ratio of 0.06% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $3 per year of difference.

Which performed better, IUSB or VTI?

Over the past year IUSB returned +1.98% vs +21.79% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (12 years), IUSB annualized +0.65% vs +8.06% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Which is riskier, IUSB or VTI?

VTI has been the more volatile fund at 15.3% annualized versus 4.8% for IUSB. Worst drawdown: IUSB -50.2% vs VTI -56.6%.

Should I hold both IUSB and VTI?

IUSB and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.45, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.

What is the holdings overlap between IUSB and VTI?

IUSB and VTI share 5 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 12097 unique securities.

Which pays a higher dividend, IUSB or VTI?

IUSB yields 4.20% while VTI yields 1.07%, so IUSB currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Get Full ETF Analytics

Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.

See inside every ETF you own
$29/moCancel anytime.
Try FundXLS →