ILCV vs VYM

Quick Verdict

ILCV delivered stronger 1-year returns. VYM offers more diversification with 558 holdings.

Lower Fees: TiedHigher Returns: ILCVMore Diversified: VYM

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricILCVVYMWinner
Expense Ratio0.04%0.04%
AUM$1.3B$79.0B
Dividend Yield1.62%2.86%
Holdings380568
YTD Return+12.10%+13.24%
1Y Return+27.50%+23.76%
3Y Return (annualized)+17.49%+16.97%
5Y Return (annualized)+12.48%+12.26%
Volatility (annualized)14.4%14.6%
Max Drawdown-60.9%-58.8%
Fund FamilyiShares by BlackRock (US)Vanguard (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
InceptionJun 28, 2004Nov 10, 2006

ILCV vs VYM Performance

iShares Morningstar Value ETF (ILCV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year ILCV returned +27.50% while VYM returned +23.76%. Year to date, ILCV is up 12.10% versus a gain of 13.24% for VYM.

Over three years, ILCV compounded at +17.49% per year against +16.97% for VYM; over five years the annualized figures are +12.48% and +12.26% respectively. Across the full 20-year window we track, VYM has the edge at +6.96% annualized vs +6.40%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

VYM has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.6% compared with 14.4% for ILCV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -60.9% for ILCV and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.97. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.

Fees and Cost Over Time

ILCV charges 0.04% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $4 vs $4 annually. On income, ILCV currently yields 1.62% against 2.86% for VYM.

Holdings Overlap

50.4%overlap

ILCV and VYM share 198 holdings out of 732 unique holdings combined, representing a 50.4% weight overlap.

High overlap means holding both may not provide much additional diversification.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in ILCVWeight in VYMDifference
JPM2.73%3.36%0.63%
XOM1.70%2.83%1.13%
JNJ1.87%2.62%0.75%
WMTProProPro
ABBVProProPro
PGProProPro
CSCOProProPro
HDProProPro
BACProProPro
CVXProProPro
See all 10 holdings ILCV shares with VYM
Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position.
Get FundXLS Pro: $29/moFirst 500 subscribers, then $49/mo. Cancel anytime.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, ILCV or VYM?

ILCV has an expense ratio of 0.04% while VYM charges 0.04%. They cost the same. On a $10,000 investment, that is $0 per year of difference.

Which performed better, ILCV or VYM?

Over the past year ILCV returned +27.50% vs +23.76% for VYM, so ILCV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (20 years), ILCV annualized +6.40% vs +6.96% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Which is riskier, ILCV or VYM?

VYM has been the more volatile fund at 14.6% annualized versus 14.4% for ILCV. Worst drawdown: ILCV -60.9% vs VYM -58.8%.

Should I hold both ILCV and VYM?

ILCV and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.97, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.

What is the holdings overlap between ILCV and VYM?

ILCV and VYM share 198 common holdings with a 50.4% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 732 unique securities.

Which pays a higher dividend, ILCV or VYM?

ILCV yields 1.62% while VYM yields 2.86%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Get Full ETF Analytics

Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.

See inside every ETF you own
$29/moCancel anytime.
Try FundXLS →