ILCB vs SPY

Quick Verdict

ILCB has a lower expense ratio. SPY delivered stronger 1-year returns. SPY offers more diversification with 503 holdings.

Lower Fees: ILCBHigher Returns: SPYMore Diversified: SPY

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricILCBSPYWinner
Expense Ratio0.03%0.09%
AUM$1.3B$789.1B
Dividend Yield0.98%1.01%
Holdings533505
YTD Return+13.15%+13.10%
1Y Return+22.55%+22.80%
3Y Return (annualized)+21.21%+20.98%
5Y Return (annualized)+12.72%+13.20%
Volatility (annualized)14.7%15.3%
Max Drawdown-52.8%-56.5%
Fund FamilyiShares by BlackRock (US)State Street Investment Management
CategoryEquityEquity
InceptionJun 28, 2004Jan 22, 1993

ILCB vs SPY Performance

iShares Morningstar US Equity ETF (ILCB) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust (SPY) is a ETF from State Street Investment Management. Over the past year ILCB returned +22.55% while SPY returned +22.80%. Year to date, ILCB is up 13.15% versus a gain of 13.10% for SPY.

Over three years, ILCB compounded at +21.21% per year against +20.98% for SPY; over five years the annualized figures are +12.72% and +13.20% respectively. Across the full 22-year window we track, ILCB has the edge at +9.67% annualized vs +8.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

SPY has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.3% compared with 14.7% for ILCB. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -52.8% for ILCB and -56.5% for SPY. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.99. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.

Fees and Cost Over Time

ILCB charges 0.03% per year while SPY charges 0.09%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $9 annually, a gap of $6 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ILCB currently yields 0.98% against 1.01% for SPY.

Holdings Overlap

93.3%overlap

ILCB and SPY share 410 holdings out of 592 unique holdings combined, representing a 93.3% weight overlap.

High overlap means holding both may not provide much additional diversification.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in ILCBWeight in SPYDifference
NVDA6.96%7.31%0.35%
AAPL6.97%7.09%0.12%
MSFT4.36%4.43%0.07%
AMZNProProPro
GOOGLProProPro
AVGOProProPro
GOOGProProPro
METAProProPro
TSLAProProPro
MUProProPro
See all 10 holdings ILCB shares with SPY
Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position.
Get FundXLS Pro: $29/moFirst 500 subscribers, then $49/mo. Cancel anytime.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, ILCB or SPY?

ILCB has an expense ratio of 0.03% while SPY charges 0.09%. ILCB is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $6 per year of difference.

Which performed better, ILCB or SPY?

Over the past year ILCB returned +22.55% vs +22.80% for SPY, so SPY leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (22 years), ILCB annualized +9.67% vs +8.83% for SPY. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Which is riskier, ILCB or SPY?

SPY has been the more volatile fund at 15.3% annualized versus 14.7% for ILCB. Worst drawdown: ILCB -52.8% vs SPY -56.5%.

Should I hold both ILCB and SPY?

ILCB and SPY have a monthly-return correlation of 0.99, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.

What is the holdings overlap between ILCB and SPY?

ILCB and SPY share 410 common holdings with a 93.3% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 592 unique securities.

Which pays a higher dividend, ILCB or SPY?

ILCB yields 0.98% while SPY yields 1.01%, so SPY currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Get Full ETF Analytics

Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.

See inside every ETF you own
$29/moCancel anytime.
Try FundXLS →