ILCB vs IVV

Quick Verdict

IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.

Lower Fees: TiedHigher Returns: IVVMore Diversified: IVV

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricILCBIVVWinner
Expense Ratio0.03%0.03%
AUM$1.3B$865.2B
Dividend Yield0.98%1.09%
Holdings533508
YTD Return+13.51%+13.52%
1Y Return+23.30%+23.63%
3Y Return (annualized)+21.38%+21.26%
5Y Return (annualized)+12.93%+13.52%
Volatility (annualized)14.7%15.1%
Max Drawdown-52.8%-56.5%
Fund FamilyiShares by BlackRock (US)iShares by BlackRock (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
InceptionJun 28, 2004May 15, 2000

ILCB vs IVV Performance

iShares Morningstar US Equity ETF (ILCB) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year ILCB returned +23.30% while IVV returned +23.63%. Year to date, ILCB is up 13.51% versus a gain of 13.52% for IVV.

Over three years, ILCB compounded at +21.38% per year against +21.26% for IVV; over five years the annualized figures are +12.93% and +13.52% respectively. Across the full 22-year window we track, ILCB has the edge at +9.69% annualized vs +7.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 14.7% for ILCB. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -52.8% for ILCB and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.99. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.

Fees and Cost Over Time

ILCB charges 0.03% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $3 annually. On income, ILCB currently yields 0.98% against 1.09% for IVV.

Holdings Overlap

91.2%overlap

ILCB and IVV share 411 holdings out of 593 unique holdings combined, representing a 91.2% weight overlap.

High overlap means holding both may not provide much additional diversification.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in ILCBWeight in IVVDifference
NVDA6.96%7.76%0.80%
AAPL6.97%7.44%0.47%
MSFT4.36%4.57%0.21%
AMZNProProPro
GOOGLProProPro
AVGOProProPro
GOOGProProPro
METAProProPro
TSLAProProPro
MUProProPro
See all 10 holdings ILCB shares with IVV
Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position.
Get FundXLS Pro: $29/moFirst 500 subscribers, then $49/mo. Cancel anytime.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, ILCB or IVV?

ILCB has an expense ratio of 0.03% while IVV charges 0.03%. They cost the same. On a $10,000 investment, that is $0 per year of difference.

Which performed better, ILCB or IVV?

Over the past year ILCB returned +23.30% vs +23.63% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (22 years), ILCB annualized +9.69% vs +7.04% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Which is riskier, ILCB or IVV?

IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 14.7% for ILCB. Worst drawdown: ILCB -52.8% vs IVV -56.5%.

Should I hold both ILCB and IVV?

ILCB and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.99, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.

What is the holdings overlap between ILCB and IVV?

ILCB and IVV share 411 common holdings with a 91.2% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 593 unique securities.

Which pays a higher dividend, ILCB or IVV?

ILCB yields 0.98% while IVV yields 1.09%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Get Full ETF Analytics

Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.

See inside every ETF you own
$29/moCancel anytime.
Try FundXLS →