GLBL vs VTI

Quick Verdict

VTI has a lower expense ratio. GLBL delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 2783 holdings.

Lower Fees: VTIHigher Returns: GLBLMore Diversified: VTI

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricGLBLVTIWinner
Expense Ratio0.65%0.03%
AUM$1M$663.5B
Dividend Yield0.77%1.07%
Holdings3753,543
YTD Return+14.96%+13.57%
1Y Return+25.61%+24.23%
3Y Return (annualized)-+20.73%
5Y Return (annualized)-+12.24%
Volatility (annualized)15.7%15.3%
Max Drawdown-19.8%-56.6%
Fund FamilyPacer ETFsVanguard (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
InceptionSep 16, 2024May 24, 2001

GLBL vs VTI Performance

Pacer MSCI World Industry Advantage ETF (GLBL) is a ETF from Pacer ETFs and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year GLBL returned +25.61% while VTI returned +24.23%. Year to date, GLBL is up 14.96% versus a gain of 13.57% for VTI.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

GLBL has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.7% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -19.8% for GLBL and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.97. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.

Fees and Cost Over Time

GLBL charges 0.65% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $65 vs $3 annually, a gap of $62 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GLBL currently yields 0.77% against 1.07% for VTI.

Holdings Overlap

55.5%overlap

GLBL and VTI share 225 holdings out of 2913 unique holdings combined, representing a 55.5% weight overlap.

High overlap means holding both may not provide much additional diversification.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in GLBLWeight in VTIDifference
AAPL5.08%5.84%0.76%
NVDA4.35%6.32%1.97%
MSFT4.63%3.81%0.82%
AMZNProProPro
GOOGLProProPro
AVGOProProPro
GOOGProProPro
METAProProPro
MUProProPro
AMDProProPro
See all 10 holdings GLBL shares with VTI
Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position.
Get FundXLS Pro: $29/moFirst 500 subscribers, then $49/mo. Cancel anytime.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, GLBL or VTI?

GLBL has an expense ratio of 0.65% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $62 per year of difference.

Which performed better, GLBL or VTI?

Over the past year GLBL returned +25.61% vs +24.23% for VTI, so GLBL leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), GLBL annualized +21.61% vs +8.12% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Which is riskier, GLBL or VTI?

GLBL has been the more volatile fund at 15.7% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: GLBL -19.8% vs VTI -56.6%.

Should I hold both GLBL and VTI?

GLBL and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.97, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.

What is the holdings overlap between GLBL and VTI?

GLBL and VTI share 225 common holdings with a 55.5% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2913 unique securities.

Which pays a higher dividend, GLBL or VTI?

GLBL yields 0.77% while VTI yields 1.07%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Get Full ETF Analytics

Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.

See inside every ETF you own
$29/moCancel anytime.
Try FundXLS →