GIGL vs VTI
GIGL vs VTI
Goldman Sachs Corporate Bond ETF vs Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 2783 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GIGL | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.29% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $216M | $663.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 3.75% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 251 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | -0.55% | +13.39% | |
| 1Y Return | +1.87% | +23.21% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +20.65% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.18% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 3.6% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -3.1% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Goldman Sachs Asset Management | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity | |
| Inception | Jun 24, 2025 | May 24, 2001 |
GIGL vs VTI Performance
Goldman Sachs Corporate Bond ETF (GIGL) is a ETF from Goldman Sachs Asset Management and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year GIGL returned +1.87% while VTI returned +23.21%. Year to date, GIGL is down 0.55% versus a gain of 13.39% for VTI.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.3% compared with 3.6% for GIGL. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -3.1% for GIGL and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.55. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GIGL charges 0.29% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $29 vs $3 annually, a gap of $26 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GIGL currently yields 3.75% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
GIGL and VTI share 0 holdings out of 3007 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GIGL or VTI?
GIGL has an expense ratio of 0.29% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $26 per year of difference.
Which performed better, GIGL or VTI?
Over the past year GIGL returned +1.87% vs +23.21% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), GIGL annualized +2.79% vs +8.11% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, GIGL or VTI?
VTI has been the more volatile fund at 15.3% annualized versus 3.6% for GIGL. Worst drawdown: GIGL -3.1% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both GIGL and VTI?
GIGL and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.55, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between GIGL and VTI?
GIGL and VTI share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 3007 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, GIGL or VTI?
GIGL yields 3.75% while VTI yields 1.07%, so GIGL currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.