GHYB vs QQQ
GHYB vs QQQ
Goldman Sachs Access High Yield Corporate Bond ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Quick Verdict
GHYB has a lower expense ratio. QQQ delivered stronger 1-year returns. GHYB offers more diversification with 765 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GHYB | QQQ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.15% | 0.18% | |
| AUM | $134M | $455.8B | |
| Dividend Yield | 6.78% | 0.41% | |
| Holdings | 908 | 108 | |
| YTD Return | +1.12% | +14.45% | |
| 1Y Return | +4.64% | +24.70% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +8.19% | +24.19% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +3.81% | +14.49% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 7.8% | 30.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -22.2% | -83.0% | |
| Fund Family | Goldman Sachs Asset Management | Invesco (US) | |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity | |
| Inception | Sep 5, 2017 | Mar 10, 1999 |
GHYB vs QQQ Performance
Goldman Sachs Access High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (GHYB) is a ETF from Goldman Sachs Asset Management and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year GHYB returned +4.64% while QQQ returned +24.70%. Year to date, GHYB is up 1.12% versus a gain of 14.45% for QQQ.
Over three years, GHYB compounded at +8.19% per year against +24.19% for QQQ; over five years the annualized figures are +3.81% and +14.49% respectively. Across the full 9-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +12.98% annualized vs +2.36%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 7.8% for GHYB. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -22.2% for GHYB and -83.0% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.70. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GHYB charges 0.15% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $15 vs $18 annually, a gap of $3 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GHYB currently yields 6.78% against 0.41% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
GHYB and QQQ share 0 holdings out of 868 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GHYB or QQQ?
GHYB has an expense ratio of 0.15% while QQQ charges 0.18%. GHYB is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $3 per year of difference.
Which performed better, GHYB or QQQ?
Over the past year GHYB returned +4.64% vs +24.70% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (9 years), GHYB annualized +2.36% vs +12.98% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, GHYB or QQQ?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 7.8% for GHYB. Worst drawdown: GHYB -22.2% vs QQQ -83.0%.
Should I hold both GHYB and QQQ?
GHYB and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.70, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between GHYB and QQQ?
GHYB and QQQ share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 868 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, GHYB or QQQ?
GHYB yields 6.78% while QQQ yields 0.41%, so GHYB currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.