GGUS vs VTI
GGUS vs VTI
Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Russell 1000 Growth Equity ETF vs Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 2783 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GGUS | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.12% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $427M | $663.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.40% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 388 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +3.71% | +11.83% | |
| 1Y Return | +9.95% | +21.79% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +20.40% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +11.96% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.3% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -22.7% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Goldman Sachs Asset Management | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Nov 28, 2023 | May 24, 2001 |
GGUS vs VTI Performance
Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Russell 1000 Growth Equity ETF (GGUS) is a ETF from Goldman Sachs Asset Management and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year GGUS returned +9.95% while VTI returned +21.79%. Year to date, GGUS is up 3.71% versus a gain of 11.83% for VTI.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.3% compared with 15.3% for GGUS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -22.7% for GGUS and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.91. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GGUS charges 0.12% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $12 vs $3 annually, a gap of $9 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GGUS currently yields 0.40% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
GGUS and VTI share 301 holdings out of 2853 unique holdings combined, representing a 52.9% weight overlap.
High overlap means holding both may not provide much additional diversification.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in GGUS | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDA | 11.81% | 6.32% | 5.49% |
| AAPL | 10.68% | 5.84% | 4.84% |
| MSFT | 4.26% | 3.81% | 0.45% |
| AMZN | Pro | Pro | Pro |
| AVGO | Pro | Pro | Pro |
| GOOGL | Pro | Pro | Pro |
| TSLA | Pro | Pro | Pro |
| META | Pro | Pro | Pro |
| LLY | Pro | Pro | Pro |
| GOOG | Pro | Pro | Pro |
See all 10 holdings GGUS shares with VTI Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position. Get FundXLS Pro: $29/moFirst 500 subscribers, then $49/mo. Cancel anytime. | |||
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GGUS or VTI?
GGUS has an expense ratio of 0.12% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $9 per year of difference.
Which performed better, GGUS or VTI?
Over the past year GGUS returned +9.95% vs +21.79% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), GGUS annualized +20.82% vs +8.06% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, GGUS or VTI?
VTI has been the more volatile fund at 15.3% annualized versus 15.3% for GGUS. Worst drawdown: GGUS -22.7% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both GGUS and VTI?
GGUS and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.91, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between GGUS and VTI?
GGUS and VTI share 301 common holdings with a 52.9% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2853 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, GGUS or VTI?
GGUS yields 0.40% while VTI yields 1.07%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.