GFLW vs VYM
GFLW vs VYM
VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Quick Verdict
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM delivered stronger 1-year returns. VYM offers more diversification with 558 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GFLW | VYM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.39% | 0.04% | |
| AUM | $880M | $79.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.01% | 2.86% | |
| Holdings | 102 | 568 | |
| YTD Return | +18.04% | +15.57% | |
| 1Y Return | +24.12% | +25.99% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +18.02% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.71% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 19.3% | 14.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -24.1% | -58.8% | |
| Fund Family | Victory Capital Management Inc. | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Dec 3, 2024 | Nov 10, 2006 |
GFLW vs VYM Performance
VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF (GFLW) is a ETF from Victory Capital Management Inc. and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year GFLW returned +24.12% while VYM returned +25.99%. Year to date, GFLW is up 18.04% versus a gain of 15.57% for VYM.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
GFLW has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 19.3% compared with 14.6% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -24.1% for GFLW and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.38. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GFLW charges 0.39% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $39 vs $4 annually, a gap of $35 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GFLW currently yields 0.01% against 2.86% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
GFLW and VYM share 6 holdings out of 652 unique holdings combined, representing a 5.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in GFLW | Weight in VYM | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| AVGO | 2.42% | 6.47% | 4.05% |
| CAT | 3.35% | 1.51% | 1.84% |
| DELL | 2.98% | 0.21% | 2.77% |
| NEM | Pro | Pro | Pro |
| CAH | Pro | Pro | Pro |
| VNOM | Pro | Pro | Pro |
See all 6 holdings GFLW shares with VYM Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position. Get FundXLS Pro: $29/moFirst 500 subscribers, then $49/mo. Cancel anytime. | |||
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GFLW or VYM?
GFLW has an expense ratio of 0.39% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $35 per year of difference.
Which performed better, GFLW or VYM?
Over the past year GFLW returned +24.12% vs +25.99% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), GFLW annualized +18.13% vs +7.07% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, GFLW or VYM?
GFLW has been the more volatile fund at 19.3% annualized versus 14.6% for VYM. Worst drawdown: GFLW -24.1% vs VYM -58.8%.
Should I hold both GFLW and VYM?
GFLW and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.38, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between GFLW and VYM?
GFLW and VYM share 6 common holdings with a 5.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 652 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, GFLW or VYM?
GFLW yields 0.01% while VYM yields 2.86%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.