GFLW vs VXUS
GFLW vs VXUS
VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Quick Verdict
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. VXUS delivered stronger 1-year returns. VXUS offers more diversification with 7860 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GFLW | VXUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.39% | 0.05% | |
| AUM | $880M | $156.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.01% | 2.60% | |
| Holdings | 102 | 8,747 | |
| YTD Return | +14.56% | +11.69% | |
| 1Y Return | +20.47% | +26.65% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +18.15% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +8.66% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 19.2% | 15.0% | |
| Max Drawdown | -24.1% | -39.9% | |
| Fund Family | Victory Capital Management Inc. | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Dec 3, 2024 | Jan 26, 2011 |
GFLW vs VXUS Performance
VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF (GFLW) is a ETF from Victory Capital Management Inc. and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year GFLW returned +20.47% while VXUS returned +26.65%. Year to date, GFLW is up 14.56% versus a gain of 11.69% for VXUS.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
GFLW has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 19.2% compared with 15.0% for VXUS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -24.1% for GFLW and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.57. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GFLW charges 0.39% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $39 vs $5 annually, a gap of $34 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GFLW currently yields 0.01% against 2.60% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
GFLW and VXUS share 0 holdings out of 7960 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GFLW or VXUS?
GFLW has an expense ratio of 0.39% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $34 per year of difference.
Which performed better, GFLW or VXUS?
Over the past year GFLW returned +20.47% vs +26.65% for VXUS, so VXUS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), GFLW annualized +16.05% vs +4.69% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, GFLW or VXUS?
GFLW has been the more volatile fund at 19.2% annualized versus 15.0% for VXUS. Worst drawdown: GFLW -24.1% vs VXUS -39.9%.
Should I hold both GFLW and VXUS?
GFLW and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.57, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between GFLW and VXUS?
GFLW and VXUS share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 7960 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, GFLW or VXUS?
GFLW yields 0.01% while VXUS yields 2.60%, so VXUS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.