FTLS vs VTI

Quick Verdict

VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 2783 holdings.

Lower Fees: VTIHigher Returns: VTIMore Diversified: VTI

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricFTLSVTIWinner
Expense Ratio1.38%0.03%
AUM$2.5B$663.5B
Dividend Yield0.90%1.07%
Holdings3933,543
YTD Return+7.28%+14.20%
1Y Return+15.54%+24.16%
3Y Return (annualized)+13.51%+21.12%
5Y Return (annualized)+10.29%+12.37%
Volatility (annualized)8.7%15.3%
Max Drawdown-20.5%-56.6%
Fund FamilyFirst Trust Portfolios (US)Vanguard (US)
CategoryAlternativeEquity
InceptionSep 8, 2014May 24, 2001

FTLS vs VTI Performance

First Trust Long/Short Equity ETF (FTLS) is a ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year FTLS returned +15.54% while VTI returned +24.16%. Year to date, FTLS is up 7.28% versus a gain of 14.20% for VTI.

Over three years, FTLS compounded at +13.51% per year against +21.12% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +10.29% and +12.37% respectively. Across the full 12-year window we track, FTLS has the edge at +8.63% annualized vs +8.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.3% compared with 8.7% for FTLS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -20.5% for FTLS and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.89. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.

Fees and Cost Over Time

FTLS charges 1.38% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $138 vs $3 annually, a gap of $135 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FTLS currently yields 0.90% against 1.07% for VTI.

Holdings Overlap

34.4%overlap

FTLS and VTI share 295 holdings out of 2878 unique holdings combined, representing a 34.4% weight overlap.

Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in FTLSWeight in VTIDifference
AAPL6.08%5.84%0.24%
NVDA3.44%6.32%2.88%
MSFT3.26%3.81%0.55%
GOOGLProProPro
AMZNProProPro
AVGOProProPro
JPM:USProProPro
BRK.BProProPro
METAProProPro
BACProProPro
See all 10 holdings FTLS shares with VTI
Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position.
Get FundXLS Pro: $29/moFirst 500 subscribers, then $49/mo. Cancel anytime.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, FTLS or VTI?

FTLS has an expense ratio of 1.38% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $135 per year of difference.

Which performed better, FTLS or VTI?

Over the past year FTLS returned +15.54% vs +24.16% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (12 years), FTLS annualized +8.63% vs +8.14% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Which is riskier, FTLS or VTI?

VTI has been the more volatile fund at 15.3% annualized versus 8.7% for FTLS. Worst drawdown: FTLS -20.5% vs VTI -56.6%.

Should I hold both FTLS and VTI?

FTLS and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.89, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.

What is the holdings overlap between FTLS and VTI?

FTLS and VTI share 295 common holdings with a 34.4% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2878 unique securities.

Which pays a higher dividend, FTLS or VTI?

FTLS yields 0.90% while VTI yields 1.07%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Get Full ETF Analytics

Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.

See inside every ETF you own
$29/moCancel anytime.
Try FundXLS →