FNDX vs IVV

Quick Verdict

IVV has a lower expense ratio. FNDX delivered stronger 1-year returns. FNDX offers more diversification with 735 holdings.

Lower Fees: IVVHigher Returns: FNDXMore Diversified: FNDX

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricFNDXIVVWinner
Expense Ratio0.25%0.03%
AUM$26.6B$865.2B
Dividend Yield1.48%1.09%
Holdings738508
YTD Return+18.42%+13.31%
1Y Return+33.13%+24.00%
3Y Return (annualized)+19.97%+21.16%
5Y Return (annualized)+14.09%+13.34%
Volatility (annualized)14.9%15.1%
Max Drawdown-37.7%-56.5%
Fund FamilyCharles Schwab Asset ManagementiShares by BlackRock (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
InceptionAug 15, 2013May 15, 2000

FNDX vs IVV Performance

Schwab Fundamental US Large Company ETF (FNDX) is a ETF from Charles Schwab Asset Management and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year FNDX returned +33.13% while IVV returned +24.00%. Year to date, FNDX is up 18.42% versus a gain of 13.31% for IVV.

Over three years, FNDX compounded at +19.97% per year against +21.16% for IVV; over five years the annualized figures are +14.09% and +13.34% respectively. Across the full 13-year window we track, FNDX has the edge at +12.00% annualized vs +7.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 14.9% for FNDX. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -37.7% for FNDX and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.94. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.

Fees and Cost Over Time

FNDX charges 0.25% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $25 vs $3 annually, a gap of $22 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FNDX currently yields 1.48% against 1.09% for IVV.

Holdings Overlap

60.5%overlap

FNDX and IVV share 457 holdings out of 783 unique holdings combined, representing a 60.5% weight overlap.

High overlap means holding both may not provide much additional diversification.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in FNDXWeight in IVVDifference
AAPL4.81%7.44%2.63%
NVDA0.60%7.76%7.16%
MSFT2.18%4.57%2.39%
AMZNProProPro
GOOGLProProPro
GOOGProProPro
METAProProPro
XOMProProPro
AVGOProProPro
JPMProProPro
See all 10 holdings FNDX shares with IVV
Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position.
Get FundXLS Pro: $29/moFirst 500 subscribers, then $49/mo. Cancel anytime.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, FNDX or IVV?

FNDX has an expense ratio of 0.25% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $22 per year of difference.

Which performed better, FNDX or IVV?

Over the past year FNDX returned +33.13% vs +24.00% for IVV, so FNDX leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (13 years), FNDX annualized +12.00% vs +7.03% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Which is riskier, FNDX or IVV?

IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 14.9% for FNDX. Worst drawdown: FNDX -37.7% vs IVV -56.5%.

Should I hold both FNDX and IVV?

FNDX and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.94, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.

What is the holdings overlap between FNDX and IVV?

FNDX and IVV share 457 common holdings with a 60.5% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 783 unique securities.

Which pays a higher dividend, FNDX or IVV?

FNDX yields 1.48% while IVV yields 1.09%, so FNDX currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Get Full ETF Analytics

Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.

See inside every ETF you own
$29/moCancel anytime.
Try FundXLS →