FFND vs VTI

Quick Verdict

VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 2783 holdings.

Lower Fees: VTIHigher Returns: VTIMore Diversified: VTI

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricFFNDVTIWinner
Expense Ratio1.00%0.03%
AUM$100M$663.5B
Dividend Yield0.61%1.07%
Holdings933,543
YTD Return+10.07%+13.39%
1Y Return+18.50%+23.21%
3Y Return (annualized)+20.52%+20.65%
5Y Return (annualized)+5.76%+12.18%
Volatility (annualized)22.9%15.3%
Max Drawdown-47.8%-56.6%
Fund FamilyThe Future FundVanguard (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
InceptionAug 24, 2021May 24, 2001

FFND vs VTI Performance

One Global ETF (FFND) is a ETF from The Future Fund and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year FFND returned +18.50% while VTI returned +23.21%. Year to date, FFND is up 10.07% versus a gain of 13.39% for VTI.

Over three years, FFND compounded at +20.52% per year against +20.65% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +5.76% and +12.18% respectively. Across the full 5-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +8.11% annualized vs +5.76%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

FFND has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 22.9% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -47.8% for FFND and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.89. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.

Fees and Cost Over Time

FFND charges 1.00% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $100 vs $3 annually, a gap of $97 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FFND currently yields 0.61% against 1.07% for VTI.

Holdings Overlap

31.9%overlap

FFND and VTI share 57 holdings out of 2816 unique holdings combined, representing a 31.9% weight overlap.

Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in FFNDWeight in VTIDifference
NVDA5.24%6.32%1.08%
AAPL4.36%5.84%1.48%
AMZN4.60%3.17%1.43%
MSFTProProPro
GOOGLProProPro
AVGOProProPro
METAProProPro
JPM:USProProPro
JNJProProPro
CATProProPro
See all 10 holdings FFND shares with VTI
Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position.
Get FundXLS Pro: $29/moFirst 500 subscribers, then $49/mo. Cancel anytime.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, FFND or VTI?

FFND has an expense ratio of 1.00% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $97 per year of difference.

Which performed better, FFND or VTI?

Over the past year FFND returned +18.50% vs +23.21% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (5 years), FFND annualized +5.76% vs +8.11% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Which is riskier, FFND or VTI?

FFND has been the more volatile fund at 22.9% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: FFND -47.8% vs VTI -56.6%.

Should I hold both FFND and VTI?

FFND and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.89, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.

What is the holdings overlap between FFND and VTI?

FFND and VTI share 57 common holdings with a 31.9% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2816 unique securities.

Which pays a higher dividend, FFND or VTI?

FFND yields 0.61% while VTI yields 1.07%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Get Full ETF Analytics

Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.

See inside every ETF you own
$29/moCancel anytime.
Try FundXLS →