FEAC vs VTI
FEAC vs VTI
Fidelity Enhanced US All-Cap Equity ETF vs Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. FEAC delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 2783 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FEAC | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.18% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $26M | $663.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.77% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 454 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +15.47% | +13.57% | |
| 1Y Return | +27.37% | +24.23% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +20.73% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.24% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 13.0% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -19.0% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Fidelity Investments (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Nov 19, 2024 | May 24, 2001 |
FEAC vs VTI Performance
Fidelity Enhanced US All-Cap Equity ETF (FEAC) is a ETF from Fidelity Investments (US) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year FEAC returned +27.37% while VTI returned +24.23%. Year to date, FEAC is up 15.47% versus a gain of 13.57% for VTI.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.3% compared with 13.0% for FEAC. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -19.0% for FEAC and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.99. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FEAC charges 0.18% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $18 vs $3 annually, a gap of $15 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FEAC currently yields 0.77% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
FEAC and VTI share 318 holdings out of 2866 unique holdings combined, representing a 48.2% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in FEAC | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDA | 7.05% | 6.32% | 0.73% |
| AAPL | 5.17% | 5.84% | 0.67% |
| MSFT | 3.66% | 3.81% | 0.15% |
| AMZN | Pro | Pro | Pro |
| GOOGL | Pro | Pro | Pro |
| AVGO | Pro | Pro | Pro |
| GOOG | Pro | Pro | Pro |
| TSLA | Pro | Pro | Pro |
| LLY | Pro | Pro | Pro |
| META | Pro | Pro | Pro |
See all 10 holdings FEAC shares with VTI Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position. Get FundXLS Pro: $29/moFirst 500 subscribers, then $49/mo. Cancel anytime. | |||
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FEAC or VTI?
FEAC has an expense ratio of 0.18% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $15 per year of difference.
Which performed better, FEAC or VTI?
Over the past year FEAC returned +27.37% vs +24.23% for VTI, so FEAC leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), FEAC annualized +18.83% vs +8.12% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, FEAC or VTI?
VTI has been the more volatile fund at 15.3% annualized versus 13.0% for FEAC. Worst drawdown: FEAC -19.0% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both FEAC and VTI?
FEAC and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.99, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between FEAC and VTI?
FEAC and VTI share 318 common holdings with a 48.2% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2866 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, FEAC or VTI?
FEAC yields 0.77% while VTI yields 1.07%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.