FBUF vs VOO
FBUF vs VOO
Fidelity Dynamic Buffered Equity ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FBUF | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.48% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $21M | $979.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.59% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 175 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +7.90% | +13.11% | |
| 1Y Return | +16.90% | +22.88% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.08% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.26% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 6.9% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -11.1% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | Fidelity Investments (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Apr 9, 2024 | Sep 7, 2010 |
FBUF vs VOO Performance
Fidelity Dynamic Buffered Equity ETF (FBUF) is a ETF from Fidelity Investments (US) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year FBUF returned +16.90% while VOO returned +22.88%. Year to date, FBUF is up 7.90% versus a gain of 13.11% for VOO.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VOO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.1% compared with 6.9% for FBUF. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -11.1% for FBUF and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.93. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FBUF charges 0.48% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $48 vs $3 annually, a gap of $45 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FBUF currently yields 0.59% against 1.09% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
FBUF and VOO share 106 holdings out of 566 unique holdings combined, representing a 60.2% weight overlap.
High overlap means holding both may not provide much additional diversification.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in FBUF | Weight in VOO | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDA | 7.81% | 7.51% | 0.30% |
| AAPL | 6.93% | 6.59% | 0.34% |
| MSFT | 4.03% | 4.30% | 0.27% |
| AMZN | Pro | Pro | Pro |
| GOOGL | Pro | Pro | Pro |
| AVGO | Pro | Pro | Pro |
| GOOG | Pro | Pro | Pro |
| MU | Pro | Pro | Pro |
| META | Pro | Pro | Pro |
| TSLA | Pro | Pro | Pro |
See all 10 holdings FBUF shares with VOO Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position. Get FundXLS Pro: $29/moFirst 500 subscribers, then $49/mo. Cancel anytime. | |||
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FBUF or VOO?
FBUF has an expense ratio of 0.48% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $45 per year of difference.
Which performed better, FBUF or VOO?
Over the past year FBUF returned +16.90% vs +22.88% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), FBUF annualized +13.74% vs +13.54% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, FBUF or VOO?
VOO has been the more volatile fund at 14.1% annualized versus 6.9% for FBUF. Worst drawdown: FBUF -11.1% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both FBUF and VOO?
FBUF and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.93, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between FBUF and VOO?
FBUF and VOO share 106 common holdings with a 60.2% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 566 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, FBUF or VOO?
FBUF yields 0.59% while VOO yields 1.09%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.