FBUF vs IVV
FBUF vs IVV
Fidelity Dynamic Buffered Equity ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FBUF | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.48% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $21M | $865.2B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.59% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 175 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | +7.98% | +13.31% | |
| 1Y Return | +17.81% | +24.00% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.16% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.34% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 6.9% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -11.1% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | Fidelity Investments (US) | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Apr 9, 2024 | May 15, 2000 |
FBUF vs IVV Performance
Fidelity Dynamic Buffered Equity ETF (FBUF) is a ETF from Fidelity Investments (US) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year FBUF returned +17.81% while IVV returned +24.00%. Year to date, FBUF is up 7.98% versus a gain of 13.31% for IVV.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 6.9% for FBUF. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -11.1% for FBUF and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.94. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FBUF charges 0.48% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $48 vs $3 annually, a gap of $45 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FBUF currently yields 0.59% against 1.09% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
FBUF and IVV share 106 holdings out of 566 unique holdings combined, representing a 61.2% weight overlap.
High overlap means holding both may not provide much additional diversification.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in FBUF | Weight in IVV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDA | 7.81% | 7.76% | 0.05% |
| AAPL | 6.93% | 7.44% | 0.51% |
| MSFT | 4.03% | 4.57% | 0.54% |
| AMZN | Pro | Pro | Pro |
| GOOGL | Pro | Pro | Pro |
| AVGO | Pro | Pro | Pro |
| GOOG | Pro | Pro | Pro |
| META | Pro | Pro | Pro |
| MU | Pro | Pro | Pro |
| JPM | Pro | Pro | Pro |
See all 10 holdings FBUF shares with IVV Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position. Get FundXLS Pro: $29/moFirst 500 subscribers, then $49/mo. Cancel anytime. | |||
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FBUF or IVV?
FBUF has an expense ratio of 0.48% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $45 per year of difference.
Which performed better, FBUF or IVV?
Over the past year FBUF returned +17.81% vs +24.00% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), FBUF annualized +13.80% vs +7.03% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, FBUF or IVV?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 6.9% for FBUF. Worst drawdown: FBUF -11.1% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both FBUF and IVV?
FBUF and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.94, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between FBUF and IVV?
FBUF and IVV share 106 common holdings with a 61.2% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 566 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, FBUF or IVV?
FBUF yields 0.59% while IVV yields 1.09%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.