FAS vs VTI

Quick Verdict

VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 2783 holdings.

Lower Fees: VTIHigher Returns: VTIMore Diversified: VTI

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricFASVTIWinner
Expense Ratio0.88%0.03%
AUM$2.4B$663.5B
Dividend Yield9.50%1.07%
Holdings883,543
YTD Return+5.68%+11.83%
1Y Return+19.99%+21.79%
3Y Return (annualized)+41.87%+20.40%
5Y Return (annualized)+13.15%+11.96%
Volatility (annualized)57.6%15.3%
Max Drawdown-94.8%-56.6%
Fund FamilyDirexion Shares ETF TrustVanguard (US)
CategoryAlternativeEquity
InceptionNov 6, 2008May 24, 2001

FAS vs VTI Performance

Direxion Daily Financial Bull 3X ETF (FAS) is a ETF from Direxion Shares ETF Trust and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year FAS returned +19.99% while VTI returned +21.79%. Year to date, FAS is up 5.68% versus a gain of 11.83% for VTI.

Over three years, FAS compounded at +41.87% per year against +20.40% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +13.15% and +11.96% respectively. Across the full 18-year window we track, FAS has the edge at +10.90% annualized vs +8.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

FAS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 57.6% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -94.8% for FAS and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.86. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.

Fees and Cost Over Time

FAS charges 0.88% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $88 vs $3 annually, a gap of $85 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FAS currently yields 9.50% against 1.07% for VTI.

Holdings Overlap

8.8%overlap

FAS and VTI share 70 holdings out of 2793 unique holdings combined, representing a 8.8% weight overlap.

Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in FASWeight in VTIDifference
JPM8.13%1.11%7.02%
V5.22%0.77%4.45%
MA3.79%0.56%3.23%
BACProProPro
GSProProPro
WFCProProPro
MSProProPro
CProProPro
AXPProProPro
SCHWProProPro
See all 10 holdings FAS shares with VTI
Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position.
Get FundXLS Pro: $29/moFirst 500 subscribers, then $49/mo. Cancel anytime.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, FAS or VTI?

FAS has an expense ratio of 0.88% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $85 per year of difference.

Which performed better, FAS or VTI?

Over the past year FAS returned +19.99% vs +21.79% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (18 years), FAS annualized +10.90% vs +8.06% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Which is riskier, FAS or VTI?

FAS has been the more volatile fund at 57.6% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: FAS -94.8% vs VTI -56.6%.

Should I hold both FAS and VTI?

FAS and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.86, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.

What is the holdings overlap between FAS and VTI?

FAS and VTI share 70 common holdings with a 8.8% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2793 unique securities.

Which pays a higher dividend, FAS or VTI?

FAS yields 9.50% while VTI yields 1.07%, so FAS currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Get Full ETF Analytics

Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.

See inside every ETF you own
$29/moCancel anytime.
Try FundXLS →