EZU vs QQQ
EZU vs QQQ
iShares MSCI Eurozone ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ delivered stronger 1-year returns. EZU offers more diversification with 222 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | EZU | QQQ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.50% | 0.18% | |
| AUM | $9.4B | $455.8B | |
| Dividend Yield | 2.66% | 0.41% | |
| Holdings | 228 | 108 | |
| YTD Return | +10.09% | +18.20% | |
| 1Y Return | +21.38% | +27.63% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +19.01% | +25.54% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +9.99% | +15.12% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 21.0% | 30.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -69.8% | -83.0% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Invesco (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jul 25, 2000 | Mar 10, 1999 |
EZU vs QQQ Performance
iShares MSCI Eurozone ETF (EZU) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year EZU returned +21.38% while QQQ returned +27.63%. Year to date, EZU is up 10.09% versus a gain of 18.20% for QQQ.
Over three years, EZU compounded at +19.01% per year against +25.54% for QQQ; over five years the annualized figures are +9.99% and +15.12% respectively. Across the full 26-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +13.11% annualized vs +5.51%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 21.0% for EZU. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -69.8% for EZU and -83.0% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.71. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
EZU charges 0.50% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $50 vs $18 annually, a gap of $32 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EZU currently yields 2.66% against 0.41% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
EZU and QQQ share 3 holdings out of 322 unique holdings combined, representing a 1.1% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, EZU or QQQ?
EZU has an expense ratio of 0.50% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $32 per year of difference.
Which performed better, EZU or QQQ?
Over the past year EZU returned +21.38% vs +27.63% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (26 years), EZU annualized +5.51% vs +13.11% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, EZU or QQQ?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 21.0% for EZU. Worst drawdown: EZU -69.8% vs QQQ -83.0%.
Should I hold both EZU and QQQ?
EZU and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.71, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between EZU and QQQ?
EZU and QQQ share 3 common holdings with a 1.1% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 322 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, EZU or QQQ?
EZU yields 2.66% while QQQ yields 0.41%, so EZU currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.