EQWL vs VTI

Quick Verdict

VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 2783 holdings.

Lower Fees: VTIHigher Returns: VTIMore Diversified: VTI

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricEQWLVTIWinner
Expense Ratio0.25%0.03%
AUM$2.7B$663.5B
Dividend Yield1.58%1.07%
Holdings1033,543
YTD Return+13.71%+13.92%
1Y Return+23.87%+24.07%
3Y Return (annualized)+18.92%+20.88%
5Y Return (annualized)+12.46%+12.47%
Volatility (annualized)15.0%15.3%
Max Drawdown-50.0%-56.6%
Fund FamilyInvesco (US)Vanguard (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
InceptionDec 1, 2006May 24, 2001

EQWL vs VTI Performance

Invesco S&P 100 Equal Weight ETF (EQWL) is a ETF from Invesco (US) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year EQWL returned +23.87% while VTI returned +24.07%. Year to date, EQWL is up 13.71% versus a gain of 13.92% for VTI.

Over three years, EQWL compounded at +18.92% per year against +20.88% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +12.46% and +12.47% respectively. Across the full 20-year window we track, EQWL has the edge at +9.43% annualized vs +8.13%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.3% compared with 15.0% for EQWL. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -50.0% for EQWL and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.96. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.

Fees and Cost Over Time

EQWL charges 0.25% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $25 vs $3 annually, a gap of $22 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EQWL currently yields 1.58% against 1.07% for VTI.

Holdings Overlap

36.5%overlap

EQWL and VTI share 99 holdings out of 2786 unique holdings combined, representing a 36.5% weight overlap.

Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in EQWLWeight in VTIDifference
NVDA0.95%6.32%5.37%
AAPL0.94%5.84%4.90%
MSFT0.91%3.81%2.90%
AMZNProProPro
AVGOProProPro
GOOGLProProPro
MUProProPro
GOOGProProPro
TSLAProProPro
METAProProPro
See all 10 holdings EQWL shares with VTI
Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position.
Get FundXLS Pro: $29/moFirst 500 subscribers, then $49/mo. Cancel anytime.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, EQWL or VTI?

EQWL has an expense ratio of 0.25% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $22 per year of difference.

Which performed better, EQWL or VTI?

Over the past year EQWL returned +23.87% vs +24.07% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (20 years), EQWL annualized +9.43% vs +8.13% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Which is riskier, EQWL or VTI?

VTI has been the more volatile fund at 15.3% annualized versus 15.0% for EQWL. Worst drawdown: EQWL -50.0% vs VTI -56.6%.

Should I hold both EQWL and VTI?

EQWL and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.96, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.

What is the holdings overlap between EQWL and VTI?

EQWL and VTI share 99 common holdings with a 36.5% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2786 unique securities.

Which pays a higher dividend, EQWL or VTI?

EQWL yields 1.58% while VTI yields 1.07%, so EQWL currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Get Full ETF Analytics

Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.

See inside every ETF you own
$29/moCancel anytime.
Try FundXLS →