EDD vs IVV
EDD vs IVV
Morgan Stanley Emerging Markets Domestic Debt Fund Inc. vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. EDD delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | EDD | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.90% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | - | $865.2B | |
| Dividend Yield | 10.70% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 684 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | +13.30% | +11.54% | |
| 1Y Return | +27.53% | +21.48% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +19.34% | +20.86% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +8.19% | +13.02% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 20.9% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -81.5% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | Morgan Stanley Investment Management | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity | |
| Inception | Apr 24, 2007 | May 15, 2000 |
EDD vs IVV Performance
Morgan Stanley Emerging Markets Domestic Debt Fund Inc. (EDD) is a ETF from Morgan Stanley Investment Management and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year EDD returned +27.53% while IVV returned +21.48%. Year to date, EDD is up 13.30% versus a gain of 11.54% for IVV.
Over three years, EDD compounded at +19.34% per year against +20.86% for IVV; over five years the annualized figures are +8.19% and +13.02% respectively. Across the full 19-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +6.97% annualized vs -3.79%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
EDD has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 20.9% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -81.5% for EDD and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.61. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
EDD charges 1.90% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $190 vs $3 annually, a gap of $187 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EDD currently yields 10.70% against 1.09% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
EDD and IVV share 0 holdings out of 514 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, EDD or IVV?
EDD has an expense ratio of 1.90% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $187 per year of difference.
Which performed better, EDD or IVV?
Over the past year EDD returned +27.53% vs +21.48% for IVV, so EDD leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (19 years), EDD annualized -3.79% vs +6.97% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, EDD or IVV?
EDD has been the more volatile fund at 20.9% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: EDD -81.5% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both EDD and IVV?
EDD and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.61, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between EDD and IVV?
EDD and IVV share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 514 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, EDD or IVV?
EDD yields 10.70% while IVV yields 1.09%, so EDD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.