DIVB vs SCHD

Quick Verdict

DIVB has a lower expense ratio. DIVB delivered stronger 1-year returns. DIVB offers more diversification with 371 holdings.

Lower Fees: DIVBHigher Returns: DIVBMore Diversified: DIVB

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricDIVBSCHDWinner
Expense Ratio0.05%0.06%
AUM$1.7B$103.7B
Dividend Yield2.27%3.31%
Holdings385104
YTD Return+26.18%+24.08%
1Y Return+36.85%+31.88%
3Y Return (annualized)+22.42%+14.92%
5Y Return (annualized)+13.67%+9.85%
Volatility (annualized)17.0%13.6%
Max Drawdown-36.9%-33.4%
Fund FamilyiShares by BlackRock (US)Charles Schwab Asset Management
CategoryEquityEquity
InceptionNov 7, 2017Oct 20, 2011

DIVB vs SCHD Performance

iShares Core Dividend ETF (DIVB) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) is a ETF from Charles Schwab Asset Management. Over the past year DIVB returned +36.85% while SCHD returned +31.88%. Year to date, DIVB is up 26.18% versus a gain of 24.08% for SCHD.

Over three years, DIVB compounded at +22.42% per year against +14.92% for SCHD; over five years the annualized figures are +13.67% and +9.85% respectively. Across the full 9-year window we track, DIVB has the edge at +13.66% annualized vs +11.39%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

DIVB has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.0% compared with 13.6% for SCHD. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -36.9% for DIVB and -33.4% for SCHD. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.95. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.

Fees and Cost Over Time

DIVB charges 0.05% per year while SCHD charges 0.06%. On a $10,000 position that is $5 vs $6 annually, a gap of $1 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, DIVB currently yields 2.27% against 3.31% for SCHD.

Holdings Overlap

26.8%overlap

DIVB and SCHD share 62 holdings out of 409 unique holdings combined, representing a 26.8% weight overlap.

Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in DIVBWeight in SCHDDifference
ADP5.08%2.54%2.54%
2345:TW3.83%2.24%1.59%
UNH1.39%4.54%3.15%
PGProProPro
MRKProProPro
CVXProProPro
KOProProPro
ABTProProPro
HDProProPro
VZProProPro
See all 10 holdings DIVB shares with SCHD
Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position.
Get FundXLS Pro: $29/moFirst 500 subscribers, then $49/mo. Cancel anytime.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, DIVB or SCHD?

DIVB has an expense ratio of 0.05% while SCHD charges 0.06%. DIVB is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $1 per year of difference.

Which performed better, DIVB or SCHD?

Over the past year DIVB returned +36.85% vs +31.88% for SCHD, so DIVB leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (9 years), DIVB annualized +13.66% vs +11.39% for SCHD. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Which is riskier, DIVB or SCHD?

DIVB has been the more volatile fund at 17.0% annualized versus 13.6% for SCHD. Worst drawdown: DIVB -36.9% vs SCHD -33.4%.

Should I hold both DIVB and SCHD?

DIVB and SCHD have a monthly-return correlation of 0.95, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.

What is the holdings overlap between DIVB and SCHD?

DIVB and SCHD share 62 common holdings with a 26.8% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 409 unique securities.

Which pays a higher dividend, DIVB or SCHD?

DIVB yields 2.27% while SCHD yields 3.31%, so SCHD currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Get Full ETF Analytics

Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.

See inside every ETF you own
$29/moCancel anytime.
Try FundXLS →