CLCV vs VTI
CLCV vs VTI
Crossmark Large Cap Value ETF vs Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. CLCV delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 2783 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CLCV | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.50% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | - | $663.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | - | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 52 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +16.68% | +13.39% | |
| 1Y Return | +27.21% | +23.21% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +20.65% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.18% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 9.2% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -6.9% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Crossmark Global Investment | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jul 23, 2025 | May 24, 2001 |
CLCV vs VTI Performance
Crossmark Large Cap Value ETF (CLCV) is a ETF from Crossmark Global Investment and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year CLCV returned +27.21% while VTI returned +23.21%. Year to date, CLCV is up 16.68% versus a gain of 13.39% for VTI.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.3% compared with 9.2% for CLCV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -6.9% for CLCV and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.79. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
CLCV charges 0.50% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $50 vs $3 annually, a gap of $47 per year that compounds over a long holding period.
Holdings Overlap
CLCV and VTI share 43 holdings out of 2791 unique holdings combined, representing a 11.7% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in CLCV | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| GOOGL | 2.42% | 2.88% | 0.46% |
| CSCO | 3.64% | 0.57% | 3.07% |
| XOM | 3.07% | 0.78% | 2.29% |
| WDC | Pro | Pro | Pro |
| QCOM | Pro | Pro | Pro |
| C | Pro | Pro | Pro |
| VZ | Pro | Pro | Pro |
| JPM:US | Pro | Pro | Pro |
| COP | Pro | Pro | Pro |
| FLEX:SI | Pro | Pro | Pro |
See all 10 holdings CLCV shares with VTI Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position. Get FundXLS Pro: $29/moFirst 500 subscribers, then $49/mo. Cancel anytime. | |||
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, CLCV or VTI?
CLCV has an expense ratio of 0.50% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $47 per year of difference.
Which performed better, CLCV or VTI?
Over the past year CLCV returned +27.21% vs +23.21% for VTI, so CLCV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), CLCV annualized +21.88% vs +8.11% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, CLCV or VTI?
VTI has been the more volatile fund at 15.3% annualized versus 9.2% for CLCV. Worst drawdown: CLCV -6.9% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both CLCV and VTI?
CLCV and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.79, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between CLCV and VTI?
CLCV and VTI share 43 common holdings with a 11.7% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2791 unique securities.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.