CGUS vs VXUS
CGUS vs VXUS
Capital Group Core Equity ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Quick Verdict
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. VXUS delivered stronger 1-year returns. VXUS offers more diversification with 7861 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CGUS | VXUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.33% | 0.05% | |
| AUM | $11.2B | $156.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.84% | 2.60% | |
| Holdings | 76 | 8,747 | |
| YTD Return | +14.61% | +13.40% | |
| 1Y Return | +22.33% | +27.42% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.80% | +18.54% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +9.05% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 14.9% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -21.9% | -39.9% | |
| Fund Family | Capital Group (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Feb 22, 2022 | Jan 26, 2011 |
CGUS vs VXUS Performance
Capital Group Core Equity ETF (CGUS) is a ETF from Capital Group (US) and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year CGUS returned +22.33% while VXUS returned +27.42%. Year to date, CGUS is up 14.61% versus a gain of 13.40% for VXUS.
Over three years, CGUS compounded at +21.80% per year against +18.54% for VXUS. Across the full 4-year window we track, CGUS has the edge at +16.37% annualized vs +4.79%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VXUS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 14.9% for CGUS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -21.9% for CGUS and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.80. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
CGUS charges 0.33% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $33 vs $5 annually, a gap of $28 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CGUS currently yields 0.84% against 2.60% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
CGUS and VXUS share 5 holdings out of 7924 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.9% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in CGUS | Weight in VXUS | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| BATS:LN | 1.85% | 0.30% | 1.55% |
| ASML:AS | 0.28% | 1.29% | 1.01% |
| CNQ:CA | 1.33% | 0.20% | 1.13% |
| GFL:CA | Pro | Pro | Pro |
| TRP:CA | Pro | Pro | Pro |
See all 5 holdings CGUS shares with VXUS Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position. Get FundXLS Pro: $29/moFirst 500 subscribers, then $49/mo. Cancel anytime. | |||
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, CGUS or VXUS?
CGUS has an expense ratio of 0.33% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $28 per year of difference.
Which performed better, CGUS or VXUS?
Over the past year CGUS returned +22.33% vs +27.42% for VXUS, so VXUS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), CGUS annualized +16.37% vs +4.79% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, CGUS or VXUS?
VXUS has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 14.9% for CGUS. Worst drawdown: CGUS -21.9% vs VXUS -39.9%.
Should I hold both CGUS and VXUS?
CGUS and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.80, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between CGUS and VXUS?
CGUS and VXUS share 5 common holdings with a 0.9% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 7924 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, CGUS or VXUS?
CGUS yields 0.84% while VXUS yields 2.60%, so VXUS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.