CGIB vs VTI
CGIB vs VTI
Capital Group International Bond ETF vs Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 2783 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CGIB | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.45% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $296M | $663.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.44% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 322 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +0.53% | +10.14% | |
| 1Y Return | +1.84% | +19.82% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +18.94% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +11.79% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 3.1% | 15.4% | |
| Max Drawdown | -2.7% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Capital Group (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity | |
| Inception | Jun 25, 2024 | May 24, 2001 |
CGIB vs VTI Performance
Capital Group International Bond ETF (CGIB) is a ETF from Capital Group (US) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year CGIB returned +1.84% while VTI returned +19.82%. Year to date, CGIB is up 0.53% versus a gain of 10.14% for VTI.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.4% compared with 3.1% for CGIB. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -2.7% for CGIB and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.44. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
CGIB charges 0.45% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $45 vs $3 annually, a gap of $42 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CGIB currently yields 1.44% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
CGIB and VTI share 1 holdings out of 2842 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in CGIB | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| KR | -0.02% | 0.04% | 0.06% |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, CGIB or VTI?
CGIB has an expense ratio of 0.45% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $42 per year of difference.
Which performed better, CGIB or VTI?
Over the past year CGIB returned +1.84% vs +19.82% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), CGIB annualized +3.68% vs +7.99% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, CGIB or VTI?
VTI has been the more volatile fund at 15.4% annualized versus 3.1% for CGIB. Worst drawdown: CGIB -2.7% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both CGIB and VTI?
CGIB and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.44, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between CGIB and VTI?
CGIB and VTI share 1 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2842 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, CGIB or VTI?
CGIB yields 1.44% while VTI yields 1.07%, so CGIB currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.