CFO vs VYM

Quick Verdict

VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM delivered stronger 1-year returns. VYM offers more diversification with 558 holdings.

Lower Fees: VYMHigher Returns: VYMMore Diversified: VYM

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricCFOVYMWinner
Expense Ratio0.35%0.04%
AUM$415M$79.0B
Dividend Yield1.24%2.86%
Holdings502568
YTD Return+12.18%+15.57%
1Y Return+16.52%+25.99%
3Y Return (annualized)+11.34%+18.02%
5Y Return (annualized)+4.50%+12.71%
Volatility (annualized)12.3%14.6%
Max Drawdown-24.4%-58.8%
Fund FamilyVictory Capital Management Inc.Vanguard (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
InceptionJul 1, 2014Nov 10, 2006

CFO vs VYM Performance

VictoryShares US 500 Enhanced Volatility Weighted ETF (CFO) is a ETF from Victory Capital Management Inc. and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year CFO returned +16.52% while VYM returned +25.99%. Year to date, CFO is up 12.18% versus a gain of 15.57% for VYM.

Over three years, CFO compounded at +11.34% per year against +18.02% for VYM; over five years the annualized figures are +4.50% and +12.71% respectively. Across the full 12-year window we track, CFO has the edge at +8.30% annualized vs +7.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

VYM has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.6% compared with 12.3% for CFO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -24.4% for CFO and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.87. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.

Fees and Cost Over Time

CFO charges 0.35% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $35 vs $4 annually, a gap of $31 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CFO currently yields 1.24% against 2.86% for VYM.

Holdings Overlap

36.0%overlap

CFO and VYM share 214 holdings out of 843 unique holdings combined, representing a 36.0% weight overlap.

Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in CFOWeight in VYMDifference
AVGO0.15%6.47%6.32%
JPM0.30%3.36%3.06%
XOM0.25%2.83%2.58%
JNJProProPro
WMTProProPro
ABBVProProPro
PGProProPro
HDProProPro
CVXProProPro
KOProProPro
See all 10 holdings CFO shares with VYM
Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position.
Get FundXLS Pro: $29/moFirst 500 subscribers, then $49/mo. Cancel anytime.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, CFO or VYM?

CFO has an expense ratio of 0.35% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $31 per year of difference.

Which performed better, CFO or VYM?

Over the past year CFO returned +16.52% vs +25.99% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (12 years), CFO annualized +8.30% vs +7.07% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Which is riskier, CFO or VYM?

VYM has been the more volatile fund at 14.6% annualized versus 12.3% for CFO. Worst drawdown: CFO -24.4% vs VYM -58.8%.

Should I hold both CFO and VYM?

CFO and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.87, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.

What is the holdings overlap between CFO and VYM?

CFO and VYM share 214 common holdings with a 36.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 843 unique securities.

Which pays a higher dividend, CFO or VYM?

CFO yields 1.24% while VYM yields 2.86%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Get Full ETF Analytics

Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.

See inside every ETF you own
$29/moCancel anytime.
Try FundXLS →