CFO vs IVV

Quick Verdict

IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.

Lower Fees: IVVHigher Returns: IVVMore Diversified: IVV

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricCFOIVVWinner
Expense Ratio0.35%0.03%
AUM$415M$865.2B
Dividend Yield1.24%1.09%
Holdings502508
YTD Return+10.73%+11.54%
1Y Return+15.01%+21.48%
3Y Return (annualized)+11.14%+20.86%
5Y Return (annualized)+4.12%+13.02%
Volatility (annualized)12.3%15.1%
Max Drawdown-24.4%-56.5%
Fund FamilyVictory Capital Management Inc.iShares by BlackRock (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
InceptionJul 1, 2014May 15, 2000

CFO vs IVV Performance

VictoryShares US 500 Enhanced Volatility Weighted ETF (CFO) is a ETF from Victory Capital Management Inc. and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year CFO returned +15.01% while IVV returned +21.48%. Year to date, CFO is up 10.73% versus a gain of 11.54% for IVV.

Over three years, CFO compounded at +11.14% per year against +20.86% for IVV; over five years the annualized figures are +4.12% and +13.02% respectively. Across the full 12-year window we track, CFO has the edge at +8.19% annualized vs +6.97%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 12.3% for CFO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -24.4% for CFO and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.86. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.

Fees and Cost Over Time

CFO charges 0.35% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $35 vs $3 annually, a gap of $32 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CFO currently yields 1.24% against 1.09% for IVV.

Holdings Overlap

40.2%overlap

CFO and IVV share 401 holdings out of 603 unique holdings combined, representing a 40.2% weight overlap.

Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in CFOWeight in IVVDifference
NVDA0.18%7.76%7.58%
AAPL0.31%7.44%7.13%
MSFT0.23%4.57%4.34%
AMZNProProPro
GOOGLProProPro
AVGOProProPro
METAProProPro
MUProProPro
BRK.BProProPro
TSLAProProPro
See all 10 holdings CFO shares with IVV
Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position.
Get FundXLS Pro: $29/moFirst 500 subscribers, then $49/mo. Cancel anytime.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, CFO or IVV?

CFO has an expense ratio of 0.35% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $32 per year of difference.

Which performed better, CFO or IVV?

Over the past year CFO returned +15.01% vs +21.48% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (12 years), CFO annualized +8.19% vs +6.97% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Which is riskier, CFO or IVV?

IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 12.3% for CFO. Worst drawdown: CFO -24.4% vs IVV -56.5%.

Should I hold both CFO and IVV?

CFO and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.86, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.

What is the holdings overlap between CFO and IVV?

CFO and IVV share 401 common holdings with a 40.2% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 603 unique securities.

Which pays a higher dividend, CFO or IVV?

CFO yields 1.24% while IVV yields 1.09%, so CFO currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Get Full ETF Analytics

Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.

See inside every ETF you own
$29/moCancel anytime.
Try FundXLS →