CCD vs VXUS
CCD vs VXUS
Calamos Dynamic Convertible and Income Fund vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Quick Verdict
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. CCD delivered stronger 1-year returns. VXUS offers more diversification with 7861 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CCD | VXUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 2.10% | 0.05% | |
| AUM | $978M | $156.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 8.97% | 2.60% | |
| Holdings | 612 | 8,747 | |
| YTD Return | +26.84% | +13.40% | |
| 1Y Return | +38.07% | +27.42% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +19.02% | +18.54% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +6.12% | +9.05% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 21.1% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -60.9% | -39.9% | |
| Fund Family | Calamos Investments | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Convertible | Equity | |
| Inception | Mar 27, 2015 | Jan 26, 2011 |
CCD vs VXUS Performance
Calamos Dynamic Convertible and Income Fund (CCD) is a ETF from Calamos Investments and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year CCD returned +38.07% while VXUS returned +27.42%. Year to date, CCD is up 26.84% versus a gain of 13.40% for VXUS.
Over three years, CCD compounded at +19.02% per year against +18.54% for VXUS; over five years the annualized figures are +6.12% and +9.05% respectively. Across the full 11-year window we track, CCD has the edge at +5.10% annualized vs +4.79%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
CCD has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 21.1% compared with 15.1% for VXUS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -60.9% for CCD and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.72. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
CCD charges 2.10% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $210 vs $5 annually, a gap of $205 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CCD currently yields 8.97% against 2.60% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
CCD and VXUS share 0 holdings out of 8364 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, CCD or VXUS?
CCD has an expense ratio of 2.10% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $205 per year of difference.
Which performed better, CCD or VXUS?
Over the past year CCD returned +38.07% vs +27.42% for VXUS, so CCD leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (11 years), CCD annualized +5.10% vs +4.79% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, CCD or VXUS?
CCD has been the more volatile fund at 21.1% annualized versus 15.1% for VXUS. Worst drawdown: CCD -60.9% vs VXUS -39.9%.
Should I hold both CCD and VXUS?
CCD and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.72, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between CCD and VXUS?
CCD and VXUS share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 8364 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, CCD or VXUS?
CCD yields 8.97% while VXUS yields 2.60%, so CCD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.