BTAL vs VYM

Quick Verdict

VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM delivered stronger 1-year returns. VYM offers more diversification with 558 holdings.

Lower Fees: VYMHigher Returns: VYMMore Diversified: VYM

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricBTALVYMWinner
Expense Ratio1.40%0.04%
AUM$306M$79.0B
Dividend Yield3.20%2.86%
Holdings402568
YTD Return-14.16%+13.82%
1Y Return-24.93%+24.08%
3Y Return (annualized)-9.92%+17.72%
5Y Return (annualized)-4.45%+12.13%
Volatility (annualized)14.9%14.6%
Max Drawdown-52.7%-58.8%
Fund FamilyAGFiQVanguard (US)
CategoryAlternativeEquity
InceptionSep 13, 2011Nov 10, 2006

BTAL vs VYM Performance

AGF US Market Neutral Anti-Beta Fund ETF (BTAL) is a ETF from AGFiQ and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year BTAL returned -24.93% while VYM returned +24.08%. Year to date, BTAL is down 14.16% versus a gain of 13.82% for VYM.

Over three years, BTAL compounded at -9.92% per year against +17.72% for VYM; over five years the annualized figures are -4.45% and +12.13% respectively. Across the full 15-year window we track, VYM has the edge at +6.98% annualized vs -3.69%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

BTAL has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.9% compared with 14.6% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -52.7% for BTAL and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.51. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.

Fees and Cost Over Time

BTAL charges 1.40% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $140 vs $4 annually, a gap of $136 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BTAL currently yields 3.20% against 2.86% for VYM.

Holdings Overlap

15.7%overlap

BTAL and VYM share 129 holdings out of 828 unique holdings combined, representing a 15.7% weight overlap.

Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in BTALWeight in VYMDifference
AVGO-0.33%6.47%6.80%
JNJ0.43%2.62%2.19%
ABBV0.47%1.80%1.33%
CSCOProProPro
PMProProPro
MCDProProPro
ABTProProPro
IBMProProPro
VZProProPro
AMGNProProPro
See all 10 holdings BTAL shares with VYM
Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position.
Get FundXLS Pro: $29/moFirst 500 subscribers, then $49/mo. Cancel anytime.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, BTAL or VYM?

BTAL has an expense ratio of 1.40% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $136 per year of difference.

Which performed better, BTAL or VYM?

Over the past year BTAL returned -24.93% vs +24.08% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (15 years), BTAL annualized -3.69% vs +6.98% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Which is riskier, BTAL or VYM?

BTAL has been the more volatile fund at 14.9% annualized versus 14.6% for VYM. Worst drawdown: BTAL -52.7% vs VYM -58.8%.

Should I hold both BTAL and VYM?

BTAL and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of -0.51, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.

What is the holdings overlap between BTAL and VYM?

BTAL and VYM share 129 common holdings with a 15.7% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 828 unique securities.

Which pays a higher dividend, BTAL or VYM?

BTAL yields 3.20% while VYM yields 2.86%, so BTAL currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Get Full ETF Analytics

Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.

See inside every ETF you own
$29/moCancel anytime.
Try FundXLS →