BTAL vs QQQ

Quick Verdict

QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ delivered stronger 1-year returns. BTAL offers more diversification with 399 holdings.

Lower Fees: QQQHigher Returns: QQQMore Diversified: BTAL

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricBTALQQQWinner
Expense Ratio1.40%0.18%
AUM$306M$455.8B
Dividend Yield3.20%0.41%
Holdings402108
YTD Return-15.16%+18.20%
1Y Return-27.18%+27.63%
3Y Return (annualized)-10.60%+25.54%
5Y Return (annualized)-4.47%+15.12%
Volatility (annualized)14.9%30.6%
Max Drawdown-52.7%-83.0%
Fund FamilyAGFiQInvesco (US)
CategoryAlternativeEquity
InceptionSep 13, 2011Mar 10, 1999

BTAL vs QQQ Performance

AGF US Market Neutral Anti-Beta Fund ETF (BTAL) is a ETF from AGFiQ and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year BTAL returned -27.18% while QQQ returned +27.63%. Year to date, BTAL is down 15.16% versus a gain of 18.20% for QQQ.

Over three years, BTAL compounded at -10.60% per year against +25.54% for QQQ; over five years the annualized figures are -4.47% and +15.12% respectively. Across the full 15-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +13.11% annualized vs -3.76%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 14.9% for BTAL. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -52.7% for BTAL and -83.0% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.62. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.

Fees and Cost Over Time

BTAL charges 1.40% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $140 vs $18 annually, a gap of $122 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BTAL currently yields 3.20% against 0.41% for QQQ.

Holdings Overlap

5.5%overlap

BTAL and QQQ share 43 holdings out of 459 unique holdings combined, representing a 5.5% weight overlap.

Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in BTALWeight in QQQDifference
MU-0.49%4.67%5.16%
AMZN-0.31%4.26%4.57%
TSLA-0.27%3.16%3.43%
METAProProPro
AVGOProProPro
CSCOProProPro
INTCProProPro
NFLXProProPro
LRCXProProPro
LIN:IEProProPro
See all 10 holdings BTAL shares with QQQ
Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position.
Get FundXLS Pro: $29/moFirst 500 subscribers, then $49/mo. Cancel anytime.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, BTAL or QQQ?

BTAL has an expense ratio of 1.40% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $122 per year of difference.

Which performed better, BTAL or QQQ?

Over the past year BTAL returned -27.18% vs +27.63% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (15 years), BTAL annualized -3.76% vs +13.11% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Which is riskier, BTAL or QQQ?

QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 14.9% for BTAL. Worst drawdown: BTAL -52.7% vs QQQ -83.0%.

Should I hold both BTAL and QQQ?

BTAL and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of -0.62, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.

What is the holdings overlap between BTAL and QQQ?

BTAL and QQQ share 43 common holdings with a 5.5% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 459 unique securities.

Which pays a higher dividend, BTAL or QQQ?

BTAL yields 3.20% while QQQ yields 0.41%, so BTAL currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Get Full ETF Analytics

Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.

See inside every ETF you own
$29/moCancel anytime.
Try FundXLS →