BSJX vs VTI
BSJX vs VTI
Invesco BulletShares 2033 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF vs Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 2783 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BSJX | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.42% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $20M | $663.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 6.14% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 141 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +1.38% | +10.14% | |
| 1Y Return | +5.57% | +19.82% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +18.94% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +11.79% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 3.1% | 15.4% | |
| Max Drawdown | -3.4% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity | |
| Inception | Jun 11, 2025 | May 24, 2001 |
BSJX vs VTI Performance
Invesco BulletShares 2033 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BSJX) is a ETF from Invesco (US) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year BSJX returned +5.57% while VTI returned +19.82%. Year to date, BSJX is up 1.38% versus a gain of 10.14% for VTI.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.4% compared with 3.1% for BSJX. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -3.4% for BSJX and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.75. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BSJX charges 0.42% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $42 vs $3 annually, a gap of $39 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BSJX currently yields 6.14% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
BSJX and VTI share 0 holdings out of 2867 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BSJX or VTI?
BSJX has an expense ratio of 0.42% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $39 per year of difference.
Which performed better, BSJX or VTI?
Over the past year BSJX returned +5.57% vs +19.82% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), BSJX annualized +6.10% vs +7.99% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, BSJX or VTI?
VTI has been the more volatile fund at 15.4% annualized versus 3.1% for BSJX. Worst drawdown: BSJX -3.4% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both BSJX and VTI?
BSJX and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.75, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between BSJX and VTI?
BSJX and VTI share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2867 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, BSJX or VTI?
BSJX yields 6.14% while VTI yields 1.07%, so BSJX currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.