BSJV vs VYM
BSJV vs VYM
Invesco BulletShares 2031 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Quick Verdict
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM delivered stronger 1-year returns. VYM offers more diversification with 558 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BSJV | VYM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.42% | 0.04% | |
| AUM | $106M | $79.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 6.60% | 2.86% | |
| Holdings | 196 | 568 | |
| YTD Return | +1.52% | +15.45% | |
| 1Y Return | +4.78% | +26.05% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +17.96% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.54% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 5.8% | 14.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -4.7% | -58.8% | |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity | |
| Inception | Sep 20, 2023 | Nov 10, 2006 |
BSJV vs VYM Performance
Invesco BulletShares 2031 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BSJV) is a ETF from Invesco (US) and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year BSJV returned +4.78% while VYM returned +26.05%. Year to date, BSJV is up 1.52% versus a gain of 15.45% for VYM.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VYM has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.6% compared with 5.8% for BSJV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -4.7% for BSJV and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.74. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BSJV charges 0.42% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $42 vs $4 annually, a gap of $38 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BSJV currently yields 6.60% against 2.86% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
BSJV and VYM share 0 holdings out of 704 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BSJV or VYM?
BSJV has an expense ratio of 0.42% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $38 per year of difference.
Which performed better, BSJV or VYM?
Over the past year BSJV returned +4.78% vs +26.05% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), BSJV annualized +9.58% vs +7.06% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, BSJV or VYM?
VYM has been the more volatile fund at 14.6% annualized versus 5.8% for BSJV. Worst drawdown: BSJV -4.7% vs VYM -58.8%.
Should I hold both BSJV and VYM?
BSJV and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.74, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between BSJV and VYM?
BSJV and VYM share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 704 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, BSJV or VYM?
BSJV yields 6.60% while VYM yields 2.86%, so BSJV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.